2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2006.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New upper bounds on Lee codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for these distance measures other upper bounds are known. We recommend van Lint (1992) and Roth (2006) for the Hamming metric and Quistorff (2006) for the Lee metric. Note that it is enough for d to be a metric on Q for Corollary 4.1 to hold, there is no need for d to be a metric on the whole interval (−π , π ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for these distance measures other upper bounds are known. We recommend van Lint (1992) and Roth (2006) for the Hamming metric and Quistorff (2006) for the Lee metric. Note that it is enough for d to be a metric on Q for Corollary 4.1 to hold, there is no need for d to be a metric on the whole interval (−π , π ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this property, the Lee distance is used in certain communication systems for information transmission (so called 'phase modulated systems', see [7,Chapter 8]). Generally, it is an interesting and nontrivial problem to determine A L q (n, d) for given q, n, d. Quistorff made a table of upper bounds on A L q (n, d) based on analytic arguments [20]. H. Astola and I. Tabus calculated several new upper bounds by linear programming [2], using an adaptation of the classical Delsarte bound based on pairs of codewords [9] (see also [1]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…//Start with |D| = 1. foreach n = (n 1 , n 2 ) ∈ N foreach λ = (λ 1 , λ 2 ) n with height(λ 1 ) ≤ q/2 + 1, height(λ 2 ) ≤ (q − 1)/2 start a new block M λ foreach τ ∈ W λ from (13) foreach σ ∈ W λ from (13) compute p τ ,σ from (20) , one must set all variables z(ω) with ω ∈ Ω 3 an orbit corresponding to a code of minimum Lee (respectively, Lee ∞ ) distance < d to zero. If rows and columns in matrix blocks M λ consist only of zeros after the replacement, it is useful to remove these rows and columns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Hamming metric, extensive tables of bounds on the size of codes for both binary and non-binary codes have been constructed, and such tables can be found, for example, in [17]. For the Lee metric, some values have been computed for small alphabets in [18]. In [19], a recursive formula for computing the Lee-numbers needed in the computation of the linear programming bound was introduced and more extensive tables with presently known best upper bounds can be found in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%