2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gl067683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New understanding and quantification of the regime dependence of aerosol‐cloud interaction for studying aerosol indirect effects

Abstract: Aerosol indirect effects suffer from large uncertainty in climate models and among observations. This study focuses on two plausible factors: regime dependence of aerosol‐cloud interactions and the effect of cloud droplet spectral shape. We show, using a new parcel model, that combined consideration of droplet number concentration (Nc) and relative dispersion (ε, ratio of standard deviation to mean radius of the cloud droplet size distribution) better characterizes the regime dependence of aerosol‐cloud intera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
87
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
14
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some in situ measurements (Lu et al, ; Zhao et al, ) show unclear signals for the relative dispersion, while many (Lu et al, , ; Miles et al, ; Pawlowska et al, ; Wang et al, ) show an increase in relative dispersion with decrease in number concentration, consistent with the findings presented here. Recent studies by Chen et al, (, , ) suggest that our flight segments could be in an updraft limited regime, and the relative dispersion should depend on the aerosol concentration. Turbulent fluctuations may lead to considerable variability in droplet number concentration thereby increasing the spectral width of the droplet size distribution, consistent with the systems theory approach by (Liu & Hallett, ; Liu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some in situ measurements (Lu et al, ; Zhao et al, ) show unclear signals for the relative dispersion, while many (Lu et al, , ; Miles et al, ; Pawlowska et al, ; Wang et al, ) show an increase in relative dispersion with decrease in number concentration, consistent with the findings presented here. Recent studies by Chen et al, (, , ) suggest that our flight segments could be in an updraft limited regime, and the relative dispersion should depend on the aerosol concentration. Turbulent fluctuations may lead to considerable variability in droplet number concentration thereby increasing the spectral width of the droplet size distribution, consistent with the systems theory approach by (Liu & Hallett, ; Liu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Like N c and LWC, r e exhibits a weaker dependence on aerosol concentration when aerosol concentration is high. These nonlinear relationships reflect the regime dependence of aerosol activation into droplets (Chen et al, 2016;Reutter et al, 2009) and other interactions to be detailed later. Similar nonlinear behaviors have been reported in previous studies.…”
Section: Event-mean Fog Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Note that r e is actually the mean‐volume radius as the monodisperse droplet size distribution is assumed in calculation of r e from LWC and N c . The neglect of the dispersion effect may overestimate or underestimate the change in r e depending on the specific aerosol‐fog interaction regimes (Chen et al, ; Liu & Daum, ). Similar differences exist between the measurements conducted over NCP and Ontario, Canada.…”
Section: Aerosol Effects On Fog Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the results presented here certainly provide support for similar stochastic differential equation approaches for cloud microphysics (9,20,28) and perhaps even for macroscopic cloud properties (36). It will be intriguing to investigate exactly how the current turbulence-induced aerosol effect relates to that observed in closed parcel studies that consider wide ranges of aerosol concentrations (37,38).…”
Section: Atmospheric Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%