2011
DOI: 10.1787/5kg1zpzzl1tg-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Understanding and Insights from Time-Series Data Based on Two Generic Measures

Abstract: JT03311863 OECD STATISTICS WORKING PAPER SERIESThe OECD Statistics Working Paper Series -managed by the OECD Statistics Directorate -is designed to make available in a timely fashion and to a wider readership selected studies prepared by OECD staff or by outside consultants working on OECD projects. The papers included are of a technical, methodological or statistical policy nature and relate to statistical work relevant to the Organisation.The Working Papers are generally available only in their original lang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other terms, scores were placed on a common scale running from 0 to 100, with 100 being the end-value and 0 being the value that only 10% of OECD countries failed to reach in the base year. Ratio-scale is still used in other assessments of distance to SDGs (Sachs et al, 2019 [17]; UNSD, 2020 [22]).…”
Section: Box 23 Alternative Normalisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other terms, scores were placed on a common scale running from 0 to 100, with 100 being the end-value and 0 being the value that only 10% of OECD countries failed to reach in the base year. Ratio-scale is still used in other assessments of distance to SDGs (Sachs et al, 2019 [17]; UNSD, 2020 [22]).…”
Section: Box 23 Alternative Normalisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, for data series whose end-values are not explicit (A-type) and when B-type end-values cannot be proposed, the best performance approach (C-type) seems to be the only alternative. A similar methodology is used in other assessment of SDGs (Sachs et al, 2019 [17]; UN-ESCAP, 2019 [18])…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%