2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New toxics, race to the bottom and revised environmental Kuznets curve: The case of local and global pollutants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, at the regional level, the EKC hypothesis has been tested by a number of scholars, such as Atici () for the central and eastern Europe; Pao and Tsai () for a panel of Brazil, Russia, India, and China countries; Acaravci and Ozturk () for Europe; Arouri, Youssef, M'henni, and Rault () for Middle East and North African countries; Ozcan () for Middle East countries; Bölük and Mert () for a panel of European Union countries; Ozturk () for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa countries; Heidari, Katircioğlu, and Saeidpour () for five Association of South East Asian Nations countries; Bilgili, Koçak, and Bulut () for 17 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries; Shahbaz, Solarin, and Ozturk () for 19 African countries; Charfeddine and Mrabet () for 15 Middle East and North African countries; and Dong, Sun, Jiang, and Zeng () for 14 Asia‐Pacific countries. In addition, the EKC hypothesis has been examined at the global level by, for example, Alvarado, Ponce, Criollo, Córdova, and Khan (); Paramati, Alam, and Apergis (); Rasli, Qureshi, Isah‐Chikaji, Zaman, and Ahmad (); Shahbaz, Ozturk, Afza, and Ali (); Shuai et al (); Shuai et al (); and Ulucak and Bilgili ().…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, at the regional level, the EKC hypothesis has been tested by a number of scholars, such as Atici () for the central and eastern Europe; Pao and Tsai () for a panel of Brazil, Russia, India, and China countries; Acaravci and Ozturk () for Europe; Arouri, Youssef, M'henni, and Rault () for Middle East and North African countries; Ozcan () for Middle East countries; Bölük and Mert () for a panel of European Union countries; Ozturk () for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa countries; Heidari, Katircioğlu, and Saeidpour () for five Association of South East Asian Nations countries; Bilgili, Koçak, and Bulut () for 17 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries; Shahbaz, Solarin, and Ozturk () for 19 African countries; Charfeddine and Mrabet () for 15 Middle East and North African countries; and Dong, Sun, Jiang, and Zeng () for 14 Asia‐Pacific countries. In addition, the EKC hypothesis has been examined at the global level by, for example, Alvarado, Ponce, Criollo, Córdova, and Khan (); Paramati, Alam, and Apergis (); Rasli, Qureshi, Isah‐Chikaji, Zaman, and Ahmad (); Shahbaz, Ozturk, Afza, and Ali (); Shuai et al (); Shuai et al (); and Ulucak and Bilgili ().…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuznets [35] hypothesized that income inequality increases to a certain level and then falls with an increased income per capita. Various studies have focused on validating the EKC hypothesis (see for example [36][37][38]). The main focuses of these studies have been to validate the EKC hypothesis.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant gains have been made in reducing global primary emissions of some highly regulated chemicals (SC 2017), although debate continues on the overall impacts of shifting global geographies of the production of toxic risks (Rasli et al 2018). The United States serves as an excellent case study on the multifaceted nature of governing toxic chemical risks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%