2015
DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2016.1120287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New toxicity profile for novel immunotherapy agents: focus on immune-checkpoint inhibitors

Abstract: A focus on immunotoxicity is important in the education of clinicians and will improve patient safety. There is a willingness to tailor specific immune-therapies to each cancer patient, and to stimulate researchers through understanding of the physiopathogenesis, using the hypothesis that immune-mediated toxicities can be used as predictors of response or a prognostic sign of survival, thereby guiding therapeutic decisions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical trials of immune checkpoint blockade therapy with anti‐cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4) antibody (ipilimumab) or anti‐programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1) antibody (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) have resulted in durable antitumor responses in patients with melanoma as well as those with renal, lung and bladder cancers . The most commonly recognized side effects of these therapies are immune‐related adverse events (irAE) and most commonly involve the gastrointestinal tract, the liver and the skin . Dermatologic toxicity of any grade may be seen in up to 49–68% of patients undergoing ipilimumab treatment, and a meta‐analysis by Minkis et al reported an overall risk of 24%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical trials of immune checkpoint blockade therapy with anti‐cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4) antibody (ipilimumab) or anti‐programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1) antibody (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) have resulted in durable antitumor responses in patients with melanoma as well as those with renal, lung and bladder cancers . The most commonly recognized side effects of these therapies are immune‐related adverse events (irAE) and most commonly involve the gastrointestinal tract, the liver and the skin . Dermatologic toxicity of any grade may be seen in up to 49–68% of patients undergoing ipilimumab treatment, and a meta‐analysis by Minkis et al reported an overall risk of 24%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutaneous irAEs show a broad range of clinical appearances in patients undergoing immune checkpoint blockade, including maculopapular, follicular, pruritic, pustular, vesicular, acneiform and exfoliative lesions . In a report of patients treated with anti‐PD‐1 antibody (either with nivolumab or pembrolizumab) Hwang et al reported that 49% developed dermatologic toxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GI oncologists involved in clinical trials are facing a different adverse event scenario compared to the traditional chemotherapy one and need to improve their knowledge and skills to treat immune-related toxicities in a subset of patients who may already have baseline GI, liver function, and endocrine abnormalities from their underlying cancer or as complications from prior treatments. [113]. …”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, restoration of the immune function with immune checkpoint antibody and management of therapy‐associated adverse reactions is challenging. Recognizing and treating the variety of adverse reactions that may occur with therapy will become more critical as more patients are offered these groundbreaking immunotherapies to enhance the antitumor immune response . Dermatologic toxicity is one of the common adverse events encountered with anti‐CTLA‐4 and anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy and may be seen in up to 68 and 38% of patients, respectively .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%