1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.50.3614
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New tests of the universality of free fall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
263
2
9

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
263
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…If we insert in Eq. (22) the limit ∆a/a 10 −12 , coming from present experimental tests of the universality of free fall (UFF) [4], as well as the cosmological constraint (20) on the present value of ϕ ′ , we find that the present variation of the fine-structure constant is constrained to be |d ln e 2 /Hdt| 3 × 10 −6 , i.e. |d ln e 2 /dt| 2 × 10 −16 yr −1 .…”
Section: Cosmological Variation Of "Constants"mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we insert in Eq. (22) the limit ∆a/a 10 −12 , coming from present experimental tests of the universality of free fall (UFF) [4], as well as the cosmological constraint (20) on the present value of ϕ ′ , we find that the present variation of the fine-structure constant is constrained to be |d ln e 2 /Hdt| 3 × 10 −6 , i.e. |d ln e 2 /dt| 2 × 10 −16 yr −1 .…”
Section: Cosmological Variation Of "Constants"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, using the results of Ref. [3], one derives that the Lagrangian (1) predicts a violation of the universality of free fall at the level ∆a/a ∼ 10 −5 (to be compared with the present limits ∼ 10 −12 [4]), and a time variation of the finestructure constant e 2 on cosmological scales: d ln e 2 /dt ∼ 10 −10 yr −1 (to be compared with the Oklo limit ∼ 5 × 10 −17 yr −1 [see below], or with laboratory limits ∼ 10 −14 yr −1 [5,6]). It is generally assumed that this violent conflict with experimental tests of the equivalence principle is avoided because, after supersymmetry breaking, the dilaton 1 might acquire a (large enough) mass: say m φ 10 −3 eV so that observational deviations from Einstein's gravity are quenched on distances larger than a fraction of a millimeter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the gravivector in the theory introduces a violation of the equivalence principle on a range of distances of order the Compton wavelength R l . At present, the equivalence principle is verified with a precision |δγ/γ| < 3 × 10 −12 [12]. 1 This number was used in [6], in order to constrain the v.e.v.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted above, the process of refining such tests continues today. For example, the group of Adelberger at the University of Washington [5] recently reported results of a torsion-balance experiment that include the conclusion that the gravitational accelerations of beryllium and copper test bodies toward the Earth are equal to better than 2.5 parts in 10 12 . The ultimate refinement of tests of the equality of such accelerations may well be represented by the space-based STEP experiment under development at Stanford University.…”
Section: From the Weak To Einstein's Equivalence Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be tested in traditional Eötvös fashion using torsion balance technology as in reference [5] or by monitoring the relative motion of freely falling bodies as in the Bremen drop tower experiment [45] and in the proposed MICROSCOPE [46] and STEP [6] space-based experiments. To date, the highest precision, of order 10 −12 , has been achieved by torsion balance experiments, but the STEP experiment is designed to reach a precision of 10 −18 .…”
Section: Tests With Bulk Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%