2002
DOI: 10.1086/340898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Tests of Magnetospheric Accretion in T Tauri Stars

Abstract: We examine three analytic theories of magnetospheric accretion onto classical T Tauri stars (CTTSs) under the assumption that the magnetic field strength does not vary appreciably from star to star. From these investigations we derive predicted relationships among the stellar mass, radius, rotation period, and disk accretion rate. Data from five studies of the accretion parameters of CTTSs are used to test the predicted correlations. We generally find that the data do not display the predicted correlations exc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…correlated time variations of line flux (from the accretion columns) and continuum excess flux (from the accretion shocks) are not always observed (Ardila & Basri 2000. And some of the statistical correlations expected from MAMs for CTTS samples are not always fulfilled (Johns-Krull & Gafford 2002).…”
Section: Accretion Columns and Line Profilesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…correlated time variations of line flux (from the accretion columns) and continuum excess flux (from the accretion shocks) are not always observed (Ardila & Basri 2000. And some of the statistical correlations expected from MAMs for CTTS samples are not always fulfilled (Johns-Krull & Gafford 2002).…”
Section: Accretion Columns and Line Profilesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bertout & Genova 2006) we obtain the following stellar parameters: L = 0.52 ± 0.15 L and R = 1.46 ± 0.20 R . Earlier published estimates of the radius range from 1.2 R (Bertout & Basri 1988) to 2.7 R (Johns-Krull & Gafford 2002).…”
Section: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical values are about 1%, but the range is wide, reaching over 10% in the most active accretors (Calvet & Gullbring 1998;Johns-Krull & Gafford 2002, Ingleby et al 2013.…”
Section: Analysis: the Structure Of The Accretion Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%