2012
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2011.594051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New tests for multivariate normality based on Small's and Srivastava's graphical methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recent references are Thulin (2014), Hanusz and Tarasińska (2012), Delmail et al (2011), Tenreiro (2011), Cardoso De Oliveira andFerreira (2010), Okamoto and Seo (2010), Villasenor Alva and Estrada (2009). It can also be seen reviews by Liang et al (2009), Koizumi et al (2009), Hanusz and Tarasińska (2008), Doornik and Hansen (2008), Farrell et al (2007), Arcones (2007), Sürücü (2006), Holgersson (2006), Székely and Rizzo (2005), Pudelko (2005), Mecklin and Mundfrom (2005), Dufour et al (2003), Burdenski (2000), Henze and Wagner (1997), Henze (1997), Looney (1995), Romeu and Ozturk (1993), and Henze and Zirkler (1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some recent references are Thulin (2014), Hanusz and Tarasińska (2012), Delmail et al (2011), Tenreiro (2011), Cardoso De Oliveira andFerreira (2010), Okamoto and Seo (2010), Villasenor Alva and Estrada (2009). It can also be seen reviews by Liang et al (2009), Koizumi et al (2009), Hanusz and Tarasińska (2008), Doornik and Hansen (2008), Farrell et al (2007), Arcones (2007), Sürücü (2006), Holgersson (2006), Székely and Rizzo (2005), Pudelko (2005), Mecklin and Mundfrom (2005), Dufour et al (2003), Burdenski (2000), Henze and Wagner (1997), Henze (1997), Looney (1995), Romeu and Ozturk (1993), and Henze and Zirkler (1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…when n ≤ p , the estimated covariance matrix is non-invertible. The projection methods of [41] and the method based on Srivastava’s graphical method in [42] are applicable in this HDLSS setting, but no open implementations of the methods exist for power evaluation. The methods of Liang in [43, 44] are also applicable in the HDLSS setting and open implementations exist.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step in this analysis is to check whether or not the data set meets the normality assumption by using the Shapiro-Wilk test and homogeneity variances by Levene's test. Shapiro-Wilk test is generally more powerful than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test [34,35]. Shapiro-Wilk test can be used when the sample size is between 3 and 5,000 [36].…”
Section: Comparison Analysis Of Duration and Distance Between Recurring Earthquake Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%