2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Techniques for Augmenting Saliva Collection: Bacon Rules and Lozenge Drools

Abstract: Purpose Saliva is a reliable, noninvasive, and cost-effective alternative to biomarkers measured in other biological fluids. Within certain populations, saliva sampling may be difficult because of insufficient saliva flow, which may compromise disease diagnosis or research integrity. Methods to improve flow rates (eg, administering citric acid, chewing gum, or collecting cotton) may compromise biomarker integrity, especially if the methods involve the presence of a collection aid in the oral cavity. Anecdotal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the use of a cotton swab for saliva collection may have significantly interfered with collection of the DENV NS1 protein and resulted in a lower NS1 concentration in the analyzed saliva [ 47 ]. The challenges associated with the collection of saliva without effecting the concentration of the desired biomarker is currently being explored [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Clearly, more studies are needed to establish which saliva collection technique is most effective for NS1 detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the use of a cotton swab for saliva collection may have significantly interfered with collection of the DENV NS1 protein and resulted in a lower NS1 concentration in the analyzed saliva [ 47 ]. The challenges associated with the collection of saliva without effecting the concentration of the desired biomarker is currently being explored [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Clearly, more studies are needed to establish which saliva collection technique is most effective for NS1 detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose for the lozenge was calculated to mimic in vivo conditions using the average size of human pharynx tissue (35.9 cm 2 , calculated for the oropharynx and hypopharynx using information published previously) and saliva production (0.75 mL/min on average, about 10 mins for a lozenge to dissolve). 40,41 This equated to doses of 187.73 (standard deviation [SD] ± 171.22) ÎŒg and 15.11 (SD ± 0.09) ÎŒg flurbiprofen applied to the pharynx tissue from the spray and lozenge formulations, respectively, as confirmed by HPLC. Samples of receiver fluid were removed at 10 min intervals from 0 to 60 mins.…”
Section: Permeation and Penetration Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study by Peres et al . ( 24 ) undertaken on 27 patients, using chewable maltose Tablets resulted in increased compared with baseline measurements. Furthermore, 2 literature reviews carried out by Brosky et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%