2005
DOI: 10.1021/np040183t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Targets in Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning Control

Abstract: The toxic profile of dinoflagellates varies even among identical species, raising an interesting question about the mechanism of toxin regulation and production. In consequence, it also poses a considerable problem in their control methods. In this paper, we report on the isolation and structural elucidation of several new ester derivatives of okadaic acid (OA) from artificial cultures of the genus Prorocentrum. These new compounds enlarge the range of target molecules that must be considered in the monitoring… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cells were rinsed on the sieve with fresh f/2 media, and kept wet to minimize breakage. The cells were washed into a 15-mL Falcon tube Tachibana and Scheuer, 1981;(2) Murata et al, 1982;(3) Larsen et al, 2007;(4) Yasumoto et al, 1985;(5) Marr et al, 1992 (6) Hu et al, 1995a;(7) Hu et al, 1995b;(8) Cruz et al, 2006;(9) Fernandez et al, 2003;(10) Suarez-Gomez et al, 2005;(11) Yasumoto et al, 1989;(12) Hu et al, 1992a;(13) Suarez-Gomez et al, 2001;(14) Miles et al, 2006;(15) Torgersen et al, 2008a;(16) Norte et al, 1994. using fresh f/2 media (13 mL), and the tube immersed in a water bath at 100 C for 5 min. The samples were frozen at À20 C, thawed at room temperature, and sonicated in a water bath (Fisher ultrasonic cleaner, Model FS30H) for 15 min before solid-phase extraction (SPE).…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Extraction Of Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cells were rinsed on the sieve with fresh f/2 media, and kept wet to minimize breakage. The cells were washed into a 15-mL Falcon tube Tachibana and Scheuer, 1981;(2) Murata et al, 1982;(3) Larsen et al, 2007;(4) Yasumoto et al, 1985;(5) Marr et al, 1992 (6) Hu et al, 1995a;(7) Hu et al, 1995b;(8) Cruz et al, 2006;(9) Fernandez et al, 2003;(10) Suarez-Gomez et al, 2005;(11) Yasumoto et al, 1989;(12) Hu et al, 1992a;(13) Suarez-Gomez et al, 2001;(14) Miles et al, 2006;(15) Torgersen et al, 2008a;(16) Norte et al, 1994. using fresh f/2 media (13 mL), and the tube immersed in a water bath at 100 C for 5 min. The samples were frozen at À20 C, thawed at room temperature, and sonicated in a water bath (Fisher ultrasonic cleaner, Model FS30H) for 15 min before solid-phase extraction (SPE).…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Extraction Of Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because OA is a lipophilic compound and inhibits PP, it has been an invaluable tool in studies aimed at elucidating pathways modulating cellular processes, such as glucose uptake (Haystead et al, 1990;Corvera et al, 1991;Tanti et al, 1991;Yoo-Warren et al, 1993;Leira et al, 2002;Louzao et al, 2003;Louzao et al, 2005). Methyl okadaate (MeOk) is a methyl ester derivative of the OA, artificially produced in the laboratory, but also found in shellfish, and even in naturally collected or cultured dinoflagellates from the genera Prorocentrum and Dinophysis (Hu et al, 1992;Vale and Sampayo, 1999;Suzuki et al, 2004;Suarez-Gomez et al, 2005). Usually, MeOk has been considered as an inactive molecule because of its low activity in inhibiting PPs (Nishiwaki et al, 1990;Takai et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methyl okadaate (MeOk) is a methyl ester derivative of the OA, artificially produced in the laboratory, but also found in shellfish, and even in naturally collected or cultured dinoflagellates from the genera Prorocentrum and Dinophysis (Hu et al, 1992;Vale and Sampayo, 1999;Suzuki et al, 2004;Suarez-Gomez et al, 2005). Usually, MeOk has been considered as an inactive molecule because of its low activity in inhibiting PPs (Nishiwaki et al, 1990;Takai et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMR spectroscopic data of OA‐D10a were similar to those of OA, except for the presence of an additional C 10 unsaturated diol group, esterified at the carboxyl group of OA. Two olefinic methines ( δ H 5.53 m, δ C 127.5 and δ H 5.59 m, δ C 129.0) for a Z double bond ( J = 8.0 Hz), two oxygenated methylenes [ δ H 4.07 (2H, br s), δ C 65.8; δ H 4.59 (d, J = 13.5 Hz), 4.70 (d, J = 13.5 Hz), δ C 67.3], two allylic methylenes [ δ H 2.85 (2H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), δ C 30.8; δ H 2.85 (2H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), δ C 31.2], and two terminal olefinic methylenes ( δ H 5.10 brs, 5.05 br s, δ C 113.2; δ H 5.05 brs, 4.89 br s, δ C 110.4) (Table ) observed in this C 10 unsaturated diol group were in agreement with those of ( Z )‐2,7‐dimethyleneoct‐4‐ene‐1,8‐diol [] heteronuclear multiple‐bond correlation spectroscopy (HMBC) correlations from H 2 ‐1′ [ δ H 4.59 (d, J = 13.5 Hz), 4.70 (d, J = 13.5 Hz)] to C‐1 ( δ C 176.1) suggested the location of this C 10 unsaturated diol group to the terminal carboxyl group of the OA nucleus. Thus, the structure of OA‐D10a was identified as shown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%