New system of functional parameters for surface texture analysis

Zakharchenko, M. Yu.; Kochetkov, A. V.; Salov, P.M.; Захаров, О. В.

doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.488

Cited by 11 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This issue has been investigated by several authors. Zakharchenko et al [1] dealt with the minimization of surface texture functional parameter selection. For this purpose, they determined a linear correlation between the parameters.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Quality of Porous Structure Specimens Produced by Different Additive Technologies and from Different Materials

Tkac,

Toth,

Mizera

et al. 2024

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lattice and gyroid structures are often subjected to additive technologies to produce various types of products, and the current market has a number of 3D printers that can be used for their production. The quality of the products produced in this way can be assessed on the basis of technical parameters and the filament used. Such an approach, however, is insufficient. In terms of quality, other product parameters need to be assessed, such as the surface texture and the internal structure’s porosity. For such an assessment, we can use the industrial tomography method and the method of roughness measurement via an optical microscope. The paper presents research on the assessment of the surface texture and porosity in lattice and gyroid structures. For the research, two types of test specimens—a specimen with a lattice structure and a specimen with a gyroid structure—were prepared. The obtained results proved that the 3D printing technology directly impacted the surface texture and porosity. For experimental specimens produced by SLS technology, we found that it was very important to carefully remove the excess powder, as unremoved powder can significantly affect the porosity results. For specimens produced by FDM technology, the research confirmed that some “gaps” between the layers were not pores but defects created during specimen production. When analyzing the surface using the Alicon Infinite G5 optical microscope, we found that the measured roughness results were directly impacted by the specimen’s surface color, the structure’s geometry, and the ambient light, which was confirmed by a red lattice experimental specimen, the surface of which could not be scanned. Based on the above, it can be stated that the selection of 3D technology for additive production needs must be given adequate attention regarding the quality of the created structures and textures.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Quality of Porous Structure Specimens Produced by Different Additive Technologies and from Different Materials

Tkac,

Toth,

Mizera

et al. 2024

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is difficult to measure roughness on curved surfaces, as well as in hard-to-reach areas of products, for example, small-diameter holes, using profilometers [11,12]. At the same time, such a task is often encountered in practice [13][14][15]. Then the use of coordinate measuring machines (CMM) becomes expedient.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surface Texture Measurement with Profile Method Using Six-Axis Coordinate Measuring Machine

Кочетков

Troshin

Захаров

2021

DDF

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently the measurement of surface texture in mechanical engineering is traditionally carried out using profilometers. Modern profilometers do not allow measuring of surfaces with complex shapes. This is due to the different sensitivity of the sensor and the discreteness of the movements along the axes of the Cartesian coordinate system. Coordinate Measuring Machines are devoid of such a drawback. However, stylus of the coordinate measuring machine has a diameter many times larger than the diamond stylus of the profilometer. Therefore, there is a mechanical filtering effect, that affects the results of measuring the parameters of the surface texture. In this paper a mathematical model of the contact of the spherical stylus and a rough surface based on analytical geometry is proposed. Influence of the diameter of the spherical stylus on the maximum measurement errors of a amplitude parameters are investigated. Seven amplitude parameters Rp, Rv, Rz, Ra, Rq, Rsk, Rku of the surface texture are modeled. Coordinate measuring machine and profilometer with stylus diameter of 2 μm measurement results are compared. it was concluded that the stylus diameter of the coordinate measuring machine when measuring the surface texture should be no more than 20 μm.

show abstract

Discrete Algorithm for a Disk Morphological Filter Based on Piecewise Linear Interpolation

Захаров

Laptev²,

Lysenko

et al. 2022

Meas Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New system of functional parameters for surface texture analysis

Cited by 11 publications

References 24 publications

Comparison of Quality of Porous Structure Specimens Produced by Different Additive Technologies and from Different Materials

Comparison of Quality of Porous Structure Specimens Produced by Different Additive Technologies and from Different Materials

Surface Texture Measurement with Profile Method Using Six-Axis Coordinate Measuring Machine

Discrete Algorithm for a Disk Morphological Filter Based on Piecewise Linear Interpolation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About