2007
DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2007)526[1:nsdfte]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Stratigraphic Data from the Erlian Basin: Implications for the Division, Correlation, and Definition of Paleogene Lithological Units In Nei Mongol (Inner Mongolia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
59
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the upper cheek teeth of Teleolophus are obviously distinguished from those of "Helaletes" mongo-liensis in having P2-4 with a protoloph joining the equally developed metaloph a short distance before its lingual end (hypocone), and M1-3 with protoloph, paracone, and metaloph forming an inverted "U" and a metacone greatly reduced. Last, the earliest known deperetellid is from the Arshantan, earlier than Irdinmanhan "Helaletes" mongoliensis (Radinsky, 1965a;Meng et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2010). As a result, we are skeptical of considering "Helaletes" mongoliensis the most primitive member of the family Depetellidae, and the main reason for erecting the new genus "Irdinolophus" is not tenable.…”
Section: Comparisons and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the upper cheek teeth of Teleolophus are obviously distinguished from those of "Helaletes" mongo-liensis in having P2-4 with a protoloph joining the equally developed metaloph a short distance before its lingual end (hypocone), and M1-3 with protoloph, paracone, and metaloph forming an inverted "U" and a metacone greatly reduced. Last, the earliest known deperetellid is from the Arshantan, earlier than Irdinmanhan "Helaletes" mongoliensis (Radinsky, 1965a;Meng et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2010). As a result, we are skeptical of considering "Helaletes" mongoliensis the most primitive member of the family Depetellidae, and the main reason for erecting the new genus "Irdinolophus" is not tenable.…”
Section: Comparisons and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…839) at Camp Margetts; both were collected by CAE in 1930. Recent works have clarified that the Camp Margetts site was near the Duheminboerhe locality, and the "Houldjin gravels" and "Irdin Manha" beds in the Camp Margetts area are considered equivalent to the Irdin Manha Formation and Arshanto Formation, respectively (Meng et al, 2007;Sun et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2012). Nevertheless, reexamining the original CAE field notes and specimens, we found that the type specimen of P. fissus was actually from the Irdin Manha Formation.…”
Section: Comments On the Localities In Huheboerhe (Camp Margetts) Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The field investigation clarified some uncertainties about the stratigraphy of the region as raised by Radinsky (1964b) and demonstrated that Nuhetingboerhe is the same area where the holotype of Litolophus gobiensis was found. The recent study also shows that the strata containing the Litolophus specimens are the basal Arshanto Formation rather than the Irdin Manha Formation and are of Early Eocene in age (Meng et al, 2007b;Sun et al, 2009). All materials were collected from the ''chalicothere pit'' quarry during several field seasons in the last few years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%