New Strategy of Reducing Biofilm Forming Bacteria in Oral Cavity by Bismuth Nanoparticles

Abstract

Objective. Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus salivarius are the most important species in dental decay and producing biofilm. Treatment with chlorhexidine 2% mouthwash for 7 days is the best way to eliminate these bacteria. However, due to the ability of these bacteria to survive in harsh environments, increasing emergence of bacterial resistance against available antibiotics, and favorable properties of nanoparticles including broad spectrum antimicrobial activity and lower toxicity, we decided to evaluate reducing biofilm forming bacteria in oral cavity by bismuth nanoparticles. Materials and Methods. This was a cross-sectional study of 40 samples isolated from the patients visiting dental clinics in Shiraz in 2019. Samples, which showed growth, were cultured on blood agar plates and incubated for the PCR procedure. Nanoparticle powder was dissolved in high-purity water, and the final concentration of bismuth nanoparticles (BiNPs) was measured with a spectrophotometer. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of BiNPs against E. faecalis and S. salivarius was determined by the microbroth dilution method according to methods for antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Also, bactericidal assays were conducted in a Mueller-Hinton broth medium and reported as the concentration of BiNPs that reduced the viable bacterial count by 99.9%. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 21 and one-way analysis of variance, and P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results. MICs of BiNP suspension against Streptococcus salivarius and Enterococcus faecalis were 2.5 and 5 μg/ml, respectively. Minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of BiNP suspension against Streptococcus salivarius and Enterococcus faecalis were 5 and 10 μg/ml, respectively. Antibacterial activity of BiNPs was compared with chlorhexidine 2%. MICs of BiNPs against Streptococcus salivarius and Enterococcus faecalis were one-twentieth less than those of chlorhexidine. MBC of BiNPs against both pathogens was one-tenth less than those of chlorhexidine. Conclusion. BiNPs were more effective than chlorhexidine, and MIC and MBC of bismuth nanoparticles are lower than those of chlorhexidine.

Orofacial clefts alter early life oral microbiome maturation towards higher levels of potentially pathogenic species: A prospective observational study

“…The most well-known biofilm in the oral cavity is dental plaque, a structurally and functionally organized complex microbial community [ 57 ] that contains several bacteria playing a major role in specific formation stages, e.g. Streptococcus mutans [ 58 ], Veillonellae [ 59 ], Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus salivarius [ 60 ], Actinomyces sp., Tannerella forsythia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Spirochaetes, Synergistetes , Lactobacillus sp., Streptococcus sp. and Candida albicans [ 61 ].…”

Recent advances in metal nanoparticles to treat periodontitis

“…To get around this issue, researchers used BiNPs. A recent study suggests that BiNPs might replace existing drugs or be used as a mouthwash to treat oral infections due to their low MIC, good effectiveness, and cheap cost [ 132 ]. BiNPs’ ability to stop S. mutans , the bacteria responsible for most cases of tooth decay, from forming biofilms is one of its defining features.…”

“…More extensive research with a bigger sample size is needed in this area. More research is needed to determine the toxicity and short- and long-term impact of these NPs on live cells [ 132 ]. Although BiNPs show promise as a means of preventing several infectious illnesses, they still need further testing to guarantee their safety for use in people.…”

Medical Applications of Metallic Bismuth Nanoparticles

“…A similar strategy was used to eliminate Streptococcus salivarius [44]. The BisBAL NPs were even better at reducing the biofilm formed by this bacterium.…”