2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3273651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Strategies For Hole Making In Ti-6Al-4V

Abstract: The working conditions for the aircraft engines components demand a good response of their mechanical properties at high temperatures and aggressive environments. Those challenging conditions force the use of new materials like titanium (and nickel) based alloys, qualified as difficult-to-cut materials due to their low machinability. Among them, the Ti-6A1-4V is very widespread because of its high strength/weight ratio. On the other hand, a very demand task for aeronautical components is the hole making operat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In helical milling and other hole-making processes, usually the quality in the borehole end is poorer than in the beginning. It may be related to the high tool-workpiece contact area increasing tool deflection and radial force [14], resulting in dimensional, geometrical and microgeometrical variation [15,42]. Furthermore, in helical milling the tool realizes more orbital revolutions in the beginning than in the end of the borehole, resulting in the smoothing of the surface due to the peripheral cut.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In helical milling and other hole-making processes, usually the quality in the borehole end is poorer than in the beginning. It may be related to the high tool-workpiece contact area increasing tool deflection and radial force [14], resulting in dimensional, geometrical and microgeometrical variation [15,42]. Furthermore, in helical milling the tool realizes more orbital revolutions in the beginning than in the end of the borehole, resulting in the smoothing of the surface due to the peripheral cut.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urbicain et al 5 concluded that surface roughness values in helical milling are less than conventional drilling by examining different methods of producing holes Also, by measuring the diametrical error of the hole in the two sections, they concluded that the holes created by the helical milling method have fewer errors than the conventional drilling method. Generally, the diametrical error represents the deviation of the formed hole diameter from the desired diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is found that helical milling produces compressive residual stresses [15]. G. Urbicain compares conventional drilling with two other strategies (helical milling and contouring milling), obtaining greater diameter accuracy, less angular deviation and burr-free deviation in helical milling [16]. E. Brinksmeier [17] performs a mathematical decomposition of the movement carried out to facilitate its study, relating the material that is milled and the material drilled during an operation according to two independent parameters (hole and tool diameter), and defining a new "G" parameter, as the quotient between milled material and drilled, deducing that this ratio is independent of the axial velocity, as verified in Equation (1):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%