2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New stabilized discretizations for poroelasticity and the Stokes’ equations

Abstract: In this work, we consider the popular P1-RT0-P0 discretization of the three-field formulation of Biot's consolidation problem. Since this finite-element formulation does not satisfy an inf-sup condition uniformly with respect to the physical parameters, several issues arise in numerical simulations. For example, when the permeability is small with respect to the mesh size, volumetric locking may occur. Thus, we propose a stabilization technique that enriches the piecewise linear finite-element space of the dis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
154
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 For a discussion on the stability of different spatial discretizations, we refer to the recent papers. 19,20 Independently of the chosen discretization, there are two popular alternatives for solving Biot's equations: monolithically or by using an iterative splitting algorithm. The former has the advantage of being unconditionally stable, whereas a splitting method is much easier to implement, typically building on already available, tailored, separate numerical codes for porous media flow and for mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 For a discussion on the stability of different spatial discretizations, we refer to the recent papers. 19,20 Independently of the chosen discretization, there are two popular alternatives for solving Biot's equations: monolithically or by using an iterative splitting algorithm. The former has the advantage of being unconditionally stable, whereas a splitting method is much easier to implement, typically building on already available, tailored, separate numerical codes for porous media flow and for mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various discretizations for the classic three‐field formulation of Biot's model that fit in the framework of full parameter‐robust stability analysis presented in the work of Hong et al For example, the triplets CRlfalse/RTl1false/Pl1normaldnormalcfalse(l=1,2false) together with the stabilization techniques suggested in the works of Hansbo et al and Hu et al (see also the work of Fortin et al); the triplets P2false/RT0false/P0normaldnormalc (in 2D) and P2stabfalse/RT0false/P0normaldnormalc (in 3D); P2false/RT1false/P1normaldnormalc; the stabilized discretization, recently advocated in the work of Rodrigo et al; or the finite element methods proposed in the work of Lee would qualify for such parameter robustness. Coupling continuous or discontinuous Galerkin (DG) approximations of the solid displacement with a mixed method for the pressure, error estimates were obtained in the works of Phillips et al Following the theoretical framework presented in this paper, these discretizations can be applied to the MPET model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the triple P1-RT0-P0 does not satisfy Biot-Stokes stability condition uniformly with respect to the discretization and physical parameters of the problem [2,31]. For example, when the permeability is small with respect to the mesh size, volumetric locking may occur [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the triple P1-RT0-P0 does not satisfy Biot-Stokes stability condition uniformly with respect to the discretization and physical parameters of the problem [2,31]. For example, when the permeability is small with respect to the mesh size, volumetric locking may occur [31]. Due to the same reason, the hybridized P1-RT0-P0 scheme presented in [1] has the same stability issue, i.e., locking phenomena may occur when the permeability is small with respect to the mesh size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation