2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New spectroscopic and diffraction data to solve the vanadium-doped zircon pigment conundrum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Ardit et al performed Rietveld structural analysis, electronic absorption spectroscopy, and electronic paramagnetic resonance measurements on V-doped ZrSiO 4 and discussed the V 3d position in the bandgap of ZrSiO 4 . 20) Their structural results support the position of V 4+ at the interstitial 16g site (local symmetry C 2 ), as reported by Niesert et al 11) Using the angular overlap model (AOM) method, they also concluded that the ground, first, and third excited states consist of linear combinations of d z 2 , d xy , and d x 2 ¹y 2 , respectively, while the second and fourth excited states are pure d xz and d yz . The AOM method is a qualitative method used for complex molecules and cannot be simply compared with first-principles calculations on solid crystals.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Recently, Ardit et al performed Rietveld structural analysis, electronic absorption spectroscopy, and electronic paramagnetic resonance measurements on V-doped ZrSiO 4 and discussed the V 3d position in the bandgap of ZrSiO 4 . 20) Their structural results support the position of V 4+ at the interstitial 16g site (local symmetry C 2 ), as reported by Niesert et al 11) Using the angular overlap model (AOM) method, they also concluded that the ground, first, and third excited states consist of linear combinations of d z 2 , d xy , and d x 2 ¹y 2 , respectively, while the second and fourth excited states are pure d xz and d yz . The AOM method is a qualitative method used for complex molecules and cannot be simply compared with first-principles calculations on solid crystals.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%