2003
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2002.803723
|Get access via publisher |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

New solid-state onload tap-changers topology for distribution transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To show the performance of the multilevel inverter, using proposed algorithm, the multilevel inverter shown in Fig.2 is simulated using MATLAB R2010b. Several modulation strategies have been reported for multilevel Inverters [23][24][25][26][27]. In this paper, the multicarrier PWM (MCPWM) switching technique is employed to verify the feasibility of the proposed optimal structures for the topology depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show the performance of the multilevel inverter, using proposed algorithm, the multilevel inverter shown in Fig.2 is simulated using MATLAB R2010b. Several modulation strategies have been reported for multilevel Inverters [23][24][25][26][27]. In this paper, the multicarrier PWM (MCPWM) switching technique is employed to verify the feasibility of the proposed optimal structures for the topology depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lagging current results in a reduced power factor similar to an inductive load and its contribution is defined as the displacement power factor shown in Equation (9). The second contribution is due to the harmonic currents and is defined as the distortion factor in Equation (10) in terms of the total current harmonic distortion identified in equation (11) [3]. cos dpf …”
Section: Fig 5 Transformer Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, (41) can be considered as a criterion for the comparison of different topologies from the maximum voltage on the switches [20], [22]. A lower criterion indicates that a smaller voltage is applied at the terminal of the switches in the topology, which is considered an advantage.…”
Section: Optimal Structure For the Minimum Standing Voltage Of Swimentioning
confidence: 99%