2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New sivaladapid primate from Lower Siwalik deposits surrounding Ramnagar (Jammu and Kashmir State), India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Sivaladapidae that are paraphyletic when Asian ekgmowechashalids are included in the analyses (contrary to another topology in which ekgmowechashalids and sivaladapids are sister-groups 19 ), are adapoids with either a basal or a more nested placement within strepsirrhines. Contrary to previous results 31 , the Asiadapidae have a clearly more basal position than the sivaladapids in both analyses, which is in agreement with recent maximum parsimony analyses 7,28 , but not with Bayesian analyses 28 . Although the relative position of the Asiadapidae and the Sivaladapidae seems to be still unstable in recent phylogenies, our phylogenies do not support the hypothesis of a close relationship between these groups.
Figure 6Phylogenetic position of Anthradapis among primates retrieved from two maximum parsimony analyses.
…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Sivaladapidae that are paraphyletic when Asian ekgmowechashalids are included in the analyses (contrary to another topology in which ekgmowechashalids and sivaladapids are sister-groups 19 ), are adapoids with either a basal or a more nested placement within strepsirrhines. Contrary to previous results 31 , the Asiadapidae have a clearly more basal position than the sivaladapids in both analyses, which is in agreement with recent maximum parsimony analyses 7,28 , but not with Bayesian analyses 28 . Although the relative position of the Asiadapidae and the Sivaladapidae seems to be still unstable in recent phylogenies, our phylogenies do not support the hypothesis of a close relationship between these groups.
Figure 6Phylogenetic position of Anthradapis among primates retrieved from two maximum parsimony analyses.
…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Differs from all sivaladapids except Paukkaungia and Kyitchaungia in having a distinct mesiodistally-oriented cristid obliqua on m1. Differs from all Paleogene sivaladapids (Hoanghoniinae and Wailekiinae 7 ) in having a p2 nearly as high and only slightly smaller than p3. Differs from all Paleogene sivaladapids except Paukkaungia and Yunnanadapis in having a metaconid in line with the protoconid on m1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hominoids and other mammals have been known from Lower Siwalik deposits exposed around Ramnagar (Jammu & Kashmir) since the early twentieth century. Very recently, new primate fossils representing a new sivaladapid genus and species, Ramadapis sahnii was recovered from these sediments (Gilbert et al, 2017a). The specimen comprises a partial right mandible preserving the corpus with P4 roots and worn M1-M3 dentition (Fig.…”
Section: Lower Siwaliksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Indian part the HFB is extensively studied to by Rohtash Kumar Late Cenozoic Himalayan foreland basin: Sedimentologic attributes Scientist (Retd. ), Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, 33 GMS Road, Dehra Dun -248001, Uttarakhand, INDIA e-mail: drrohtashgpt@gmail.com (Received : 5/11/2018;Revised accepted : 24/07/2019) https: //doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020026 understand the variability in depositional setting (Tandon, 1976(Tandon, , 1991Kumar and Tandon, 1985;Burbank et al, 1996;Kumar et al, 2003a;2004a,b;Goswami and Deopa, 2018 and references therein), marine to fluvial transition (Srivastava and Casshyap, 1983;Singh, 1978;Najman;Bera et al, 2008; and references therein), biostratigraphy, faunal evolution and migration route (Pilgrim., 1913;Colbert., 1935;Agrawal et al, 1993;Nanda and Sehgal, 1993;Nanda, 2002;2015;Basu., 2004;Patnaik, 2013;Gilbert et al, 2017;Nanda et al, 2018 and references therein), magnetostratigraphy (Azzaroli, and Naponeone, 1982;Johnson et al, 1983;Ranga Rao, 1993;Ranga Rao et al, 1995, Sangode et al, 1996Chirouze et al, 2012;Sangode, 2014;Govin et al, 2018 and references therein), thrusting event (e.g. Meigs et al, 1995;Kumar et al, 1999;2003a,b;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%