2022
DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New scientific analyses reveal mixing of copper sources in the early Iron Age metal production at Ili, western China

Abstract: The crucial role that Xinjiang played in cultural communication across the Eurasian steppe in prehistory is evidenced by the large number of copper-based objects that represent the early metallurgical technologies found across this region. Our research adds new chemical and isotopic analyses of 44 copper-based objects dated to the early Iron Age of Ili in Xinjiang, western China. As noted in a number of publications, tin bronze and arsenic copper/bronze were the dominant alloying types across Xinjiang during t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Oxford Group Bray and Pollard conducted a series of studies on the presence/absence classification system based on the above four elements [30][31][32] and classified them into 16 copper groups based on the content of each element: > 0.1% (presence), or < 0.1% (absent), arguing that this approach presents the full potential of the chemical space that these elements afford [33]. Moreover, it is shown to be equally applicable to any set of analytical data for copper alloys regardless of region and time period [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Characterization, rather than provenance of archaeological alloys, is the most important reason for the choice of analytical method in our paper, although there seems to be much controversy over the choice of elements and their fixed threshold of 0.1 wt.% [16,18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Oxford Group Bray and Pollard conducted a series of studies on the presence/absence classification system based on the above four elements [30][31][32] and classified them into 16 copper groups based on the content of each element: > 0.1% (presence), or < 0.1% (absent), arguing that this approach presents the full potential of the chemical space that these elements afford [33]. Moreover, it is shown to be equally applicable to any set of analytical data for copper alloys regardless of region and time period [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Characterization, rather than provenance of archaeological alloys, is the most important reason for the choice of analytical method in our paper, although there seems to be much controversy over the choice of elements and their fixed threshold of 0.1 wt.% [16,18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isotope investigation was the most popular for the provenance research [27], but in this study, the embraced prill in the processing slag has reflected the remelting and remixing/recycling of different copper raw materials. This scenario was not commonly supported by archaeological discoveries in the bronze age but could not be continually neglected in the iron age [28]. And what is noteworthy is that some of the gilt artefacts contained a pretty high level of silver (lower right Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6c,d). Since lead concentration is a major concern when using lead isotope analysis to investigate the provenance of copper-based metals in antiquity [24], this close correlation between the two types can be mathematically expressed and proved by plotting lead isotope data against 1/Pb(%) [25] (Liu et al, 2022). In Fig.…”
Section: Lead Isotopementioning
confidence: 99%