2008
DOI: 10.1086/589152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Results on the Submillimeter Polarization Spectrum of the Orion Molecular Cloud

Abstract: We have used the SHARP polarimeter at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory to map the polarization at wavelengths of 350 and 450 µm in a ∼ 2 ′ × 3 ′ region of the Orion Molecular Cloud. The map covers the brightest region of the OMC-1 ridge including the Kleinmann-Low (KL) nebula and the submillimeter source Orion-south. The ratio of 450-to-350 µm polarization is ∼ 1.3 ± 0.3 in the outer parts of the cloud and drops by a factor of 2 towards KL. The outer cloud ratio is consistent with measurements in other cl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
81
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
81
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, this is why weak fields are expected to follow cloud rotation and turbulence, whilst strong fields will channel turbulence and suppress cloud rotation (Figure 2). Moving toward small scales, however, the MHD induction equation also suggests decoupling between turbulent eddies and B fields (when the magnetic Reynolds number, R M , is approximately below unity; Li and Houde 2008). This may help to solve the magnetic braking catastrophe, if this decoupling scale, L , is comparable to the scales of protostellar discs (a few hundred AU) and turbulence at this scale is the main energy source of disc angular momentum.…”
Section: Observation X: Decoupling Between B Fields and Turbulence Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, this is why weak fields are expected to follow cloud rotation and turbulence, whilst strong fields will channel turbulence and suppress cloud rotation (Figure 2). Moving toward small scales, however, the MHD induction equation also suggests decoupling between turbulent eddies and B fields (when the magnetic Reynolds number, R M , is approximately below unity; Li and Houde 2008). This may help to solve the magnetic braking catastrophe, if this decoupling scale, L , is comparable to the scales of protostellar discs (a few hundred AU) and turbulence at this scale is the main energy source of disc angular momentum.…”
Section: Observation X: Decoupling Between B Fields and Turbulence Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By setting R M (the ratio between the advection term and diffusion terms of the induction equation) equal to unity, it can be shown that (Li and Houde 2008): B 2 pos ≈ 4πn i µv i V n L , where B pos , n i , v i and µ are, respectively, the plane-of-sky B-field strength, the ion density, the collision rate between an ion and the neutrals, and the reduced mass for such collisions. V n is the neutral turbulent velocity at L .…”
Section: Observation X: Decoupling Between B Fields and Turbulence Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schleuning (1998) explains the depolarization in Orion KL by the rising dust opacity towards the far-infrared, while the low polarization in the Orion Bar, a photon-dominated region seen edge-on (Tielens & Hollenbach 1985), is attributed to a magnetic field pointing to the observer. Vaillancourt et al (2008) studied the polarization spectrum of OMC-1 and conclude that a polarization minimum occurs between λ100 µm and λ350 µm while Houde et al (2004), investigating the large scale structure of the magnetic field in Orion A, confirmed the relatively smooth polarization angle structure towards OMC1 and interprete the weak polarization levels in the Orion bar with the lower dust temperature in that region.…”
Section: Omc1mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…One of the diffuse foregrounds contaminating the CMB signal is thermal emission by diffuse interstellar dust. Because interstellar polarization of starlight is commonly seen in the visible from differential extinction by aspherical dust particles that are aligned with respect to the Galactic magnetic field (Hall 1949;Hiltner 1949;Davis & Greenstein 1951), it was predicted that the thermal emission from these grains would be polarized (Stein 1966) and indeed this is the case (Hildebrand et al 1999;Benoît et al 2004;Kogut et al 2007;Vaillancourt et al 2008;Bierman et al 2011;Planck Collaboration Int. XIX 2015 and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On high column density lines of sight in the Galactic plane and in dense molecular clouds, even when polarization data in the visible are available, the interpretation of the visible and submillimetre polarization is further complicated by beam dilution; distortions in the magnetic field topology; changes in the degree of alignment along the line of sight; grain evolution; and ranges of grain temperature and optical depth that affect which grains dominate the polarized emission in various parts of the submillimetre spectrum (e.g., Hildebrand et al 1999;Vaillancourt 2007;Vaillancourt et al 2008;Bierman et al 2011;Vaillancourt & Matthews 2012). Such complex regions are deliberately not considered here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%