2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New results on source and diffusion spectral features of Galactic cosmic rays: I $\vec{B/C}$ ratio

Abstract: Abstract. In a previous study , we explored the set of parameters describing diffusive propagation of cosmic rays (galactic convection, reacceleration, halo thickness, spectral index and normalization of the diffusion coefficient), and we identified those giving a good fit to the measured B/C ratio. This study is now extended to take into account a sixth free parameter, namely the spectral index of sources. We use an updated version of our code where the reacceleration term comes from standard minimal reaccele… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
154
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although such precision is expected given the accuracy of the data, one may wonder whether these results are not dominated by systematic uncertainties from the input ingredients and assumptions made to do the calculation. This is an important issue since in our previous studies, the best-fit slope observed in a diffusion/constantconvection/reacceleration propagation model (Maurin et al 2001(Maurin et al , 2002) -confirmed by our recent MCMC analysis (Paper II) -points to δ ≈ 0.75−0.85. This is at variance with the result of the GALPROP code (Strong & Moskalenko 1998), where the best-fit models correspond to smaller δ ≈ 0.3−0.4 (Lionetto et al 2005) in either a diffusion/linear-convection or a diffusion -reacceleration model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although such precision is expected given the accuracy of the data, one may wonder whether these results are not dominated by systematic uncertainties from the input ingredients and assumptions made to do the calculation. This is an important issue since in our previous studies, the best-fit slope observed in a diffusion/constantconvection/reacceleration propagation model (Maurin et al 2001(Maurin et al , 2002) -confirmed by our recent MCMC analysis (Paper II) -points to δ ≈ 0.75−0.85. This is at variance with the result of the GALPROP code (Strong & Moskalenko 1998), where the best-fit models correspond to smaller δ ≈ 0.3−0.4 (Lionetto et al 2005) in either a diffusion/linear-convection or a diffusion -reacceleration model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the past years, we have promoted and used a model favouring both convection and reacceleration (e.g., Maurin et al 2001Maurin et al , 2002, and subsequent studies) from statistical criteria. The main and known problem of this model lies in its uncomfortably high value for δ (δ ∼ 0.8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Maurin et al (2001Maurin et al ( , 2002, the secondary-to-primary ratio B/C is used to place constraints on the parameter space, and in Donato et al (2002) the information provided by the cosmic ray radioactive species is studied. For the discussion below, it is convenient to isolate three sets of parameters labeled MIN, MED, and MAX, defined in Table 1.…”
Section: Propagation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32], to which we refer for details. Here we only recall that the propagation of antiprotons has been considered in a two-zone diffusion model [48,49,50], defined in terms of six free parameters whose role is to take into account the main physical processes which affect the propagation of cosmic rays in the Galaxy: acceleration of primary nuclei, diffusion, convective wind, reacceleration process and interaction with the interstellar medium. These free parameters are constrained by comparing the fluxes of various cosmic ray species calculated in our diffusion model with observations.…”
Section: Antiprotons In Cosmic Raysmentioning
confidence: 99%