2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-005-6404-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Results on Codes with Covering Radius 1 and Minimum Distance 2

Abstract: The minimal cardinality of a q-ary code of length n and covering radius at most R is denoted by K q (n, R); if we have the additional requirement that the minimum distance be at least d, it is denoted by K q (n, R, d). Obviously, K q (n, R, d) ≥ K q (n, R). In this paper, we study instances for which K q (n, 1, 2) > K q (n, 1) and, in particular, determine K 4 (4, 1, 2) = 28 > 24 = K 4 (4, 1).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume to the contrary, that C ⊂ R × S × T is a code with covering radius 1, minimum distance 2 and |C| = K(r, s, t; 2) = m ≤ m. together in the row and the column of that entry is at least r. Therefore the propositions of Theorem 19 are satisfied and (5) holds, contradicting (6). Hence K(r, s, t; 2) > m. An easy modification yields the bound K (r − 1, s, t; 2) > m for r ≥ 2.…”
Section: From This We Deducementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Assume to the contrary, that C ⊂ R × S × T is a code with covering radius 1, minimum distance 2 and |C| = K(r, s, t; 2) = m ≤ m. together in the row and the column of that entry is at least r. Therefore the propositions of Theorem 19 are satisfied and (5) holds, contradicting (6). Hence K(r, s, t; 2) > m. An easy modification yields the bound K (r − 1, s, t; 2) > m for r ≥ 2.…”
Section: From This We Deducementioning
confidence: 94%
“…If necessary, replace some 0's in B by 1's until the total number of 1's in the new matrix B is m. Since A is non-extendable, every element of R appears in the row and the column of an 0-entry in A. Thus for every 0-entry in B the number of 1's together in the row and the column of that entry is at least r. Therefore the propositions of Theorem 19 are satisfied and (5) holds, contradicting(6). Hence K(r, s, t; 2) > m. An easy modification yields the bound K (r − 1, s, t; 2) > m for r ≥ 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…q-ary codes with covering radius (at most) 1 and minimum distance (at least) 2 as well as the corresponding non-extendable partial multiquasigroups have been studied in [9,7,8,1,6]. Equivalent objects are pairwise non-attacking rooks which cover all cells of a generalized chessboard and non-extendable partial Latin hypercubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The covering problem for finite fields and finite rings has long been studied by researchers in connection with coding theoretical and combinatorial applications (see [1][2][3]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%