New Results from the Search for Low-Mass Weakly Interacting Massive Particles with the CDMS Low Ionization Threshold Experiment

Agnese, R.; Anderson, A. J.; Aramaki, T.; Asai, M.; Baker, William K.; Balakishiyeva, D.; Barker, D.; Thakur, R. Basu; Bauer, D. A.; Billard, J.; Borgland, A. W.; Bowles, M. A.; Brink, P. L.; Bunker, R.; Cabrera, B.; Caldwell, D. O.; Calkins, R.; Cerdeño, D. G.; Chagani, H.; Chen, Y.; Cooley, J.; Cornell, B.; Cushman, P.; Daal, M.; Stefano, P. C. F. Di; Doughty, T.; Esteban, Luis; Fallows, S.; Figueroa‐Feliciano, E.; Ghaith, M.; Godfrey, G.; Golwala, S. R.; Hall, J.; Harris, H. R.; Höfer, T.; Holmgren, D.; Hsu, L.; Huber, M. E.; Jardin, D.; Jastram, A.; Kamaev, O.; Kara, Burhan; Kelsey, M.; Kennedy, A.; Leder, A.; Loer, B.; Asamar, E. Lopez; Lukens, P.; Mahapatra, R.; Mandic, V.; Mast, N.; Mirabolfathi, N.; Moffatt, R. A.; Mendoza, J. D. Morales; Oser, S. M.; Page, K.; Page, W. A.; Partridge, R.; Pepin, M.; Phipps, A.; Prasad, K.; Pyle, M.; Qiu, H.; Rau, W.; Redl, P.; Reisetter, A.; Ricci, Y.; Roberts, A.; Rogers, H. E.; Saab, T.; Sadoulet, B.; Sander, J.; Schneck, K.; Schnee, R. W.; Scorza, S.; Serfass, B.; Shank, B.; Speller, D.; Toback, D.; Underwood, R.; Upadhyayula, S.; Villano, A. N.; Welliver, B.; Wilson, J. S.; Wright, D. H.; Yellin, S.; Yen, J. J.; Young, B. A.; Zhang, J.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.071301

Cited by 366 publications

(434 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

417

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Limits are shown at 90% C.L. For comparison, results from direct detection experiments (LUX [67], PandaX-II [68], XENON [69], superCDMS [70], and CRESST-II [71]) are also shown. The comparison is model dependent and solely valid in the context of this model.…”

Section: A Limits On the Visible Cross Sectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[GeV] The results from this analysis, in which the region inside the contour is excluded, are compared with limits from the LUX [67], PandaX-II [68], XENON [69], superCDMS [70], and CRESST-II [71] experiments. The comparison is model dependent and solely valid in the context of this model, assuming Dirac fermion DM, mixing angle sin θ ¼ 0.3, and the coupling values g q ¼ 1=3 and g χ ¼ 1.…”

Section: A Limits On the Visible Cross Sectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to two photons at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

Aaboud¹,

Aad²,

Abbott³

et al. 2017

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to two photons is presented. This study is based on data collected with the ATLAS detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb −1 of proton-proton collisions at the LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016. No significant excess over the expected background is observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the visible cross section for beyond the Standard Model physics processes, and the production cross section times branching fraction of the Standard Model Higgs boson decaying into two photons in association with missing transverse momentum in three different benchmark models. Limits at 95% confidence level are also set on the observed signal in two-dimensional mass planes. Additionally, the results are interpreted in terms of 90% confidence-level limits on the dark-matternucleon scattering cross section, as a function of the dark-matter particle mass, for a spin-independent scenario.

show abstract

Section: A Limits On the Visible Cross Sectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: A Limits On the Visible Cross Sectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to two photons at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

Aaboud¹,

Aad²,

Abbott³

et al. 2017

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In figure 1, we show the direct detection constraints in the vs. m K plane from experiments LUX [33] with data from 2013 to 2016, PANDAX-II [32], and CRESST-II [31] as well as CDMSlite [30] for low mass DM. Each panel shows choices of g D = e, 0.1, and 0.01, and the dark matter mass fixed to 0.2m K , 0.495m K , 0.6 GeV, or 30 GeV.…”

Section: Jhep06(2017)077mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The leading direct detection constraints from LUX [33], PANDAX-II [32], and CRESST-II [31], as well as CDMSlite [30], shown in the vs. m K plane for various choices of g D and m χ . We fix m χ = 0.2m K (top left), m χ = 0.495m K (top right), m χ = 0.6 GeV (bottom left), and m χ = 30 GeV (bottom right), to demonstrate the dependence on the dark matter mass.…”

Section: Jhep06(2017)077mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The lack of evidence for weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) in direct detection (DD) experiments [30][31][32][33], increasingly strong constraints on thermal WIMPs from indirect detection (ID) experiments [34][35][36][37][38], and non-observation of beyond the Standard Model (BSM) missing transverse energy signatures at the LHC [39,40], combine to an increasing unease with the standard WIMP miracle paradigm. On the other hand, dark matter coupled to kinetically mixed hidden photons suffers from strong direct detection constraints (see, e.g., [41]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A tale of two portals: testing light, hidden new physics at future e + e − colliders

Liu

Wang

2017

J. High Energ. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigate the prospects for producing new, light, hidden states at a future e + e − collider in a Higgsed dark U(1) D model, which we call the Double Dark Portal model. The simultaneous presence of both vector and scalar portal couplings immediately modifies the Standard Model Higgsstrahlung channel, e + e − → Zh, at leading order in each coupling. In addition, each portal leads to complementary signals which can be probed at direct and indirect detection dark matter experiments. After accounting for current constraints from LEP and LHC, we demonstrate that a future e + e − Higgs factory will have unique and leading sensitivity to the two portal couplings by studying a host of new production, decay, and radiative return processes. Besides the possibility of exotic Higgs decays, we highlight the importance of direct dark vector and dark scalar production at e + e − machines, whose invisible decays can be tagged from the recoil mass method.

show abstract

Charming Dark Matter

Kirk¹

2019

Charming New Physics in Beautiful Processes?

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New Results from the Search for Low-Mass Weakly Interacting Massive Particles with the CDMS Low Ionization Threshold Experiment

Cited by 366 publications

References 50 publications

Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to two photons at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to two photons at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

A tale of two portals: testing light, hidden new physics at future e + e − colliders

Charming Dark Matter

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About