2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-014-0602-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New research directions in learning and cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blending theories in this way was first seen in Cobb, Yackel, and Wood's work (1992) and continues today (Cobb, 2007;Dweck, 2015;Galbraith, Stillman, & Brown, 2010, Goos & Williams, 2013Hennessey, Higley, & Chesnut, 2012;Lerman, 2013;Rasmussen & Stephan, 2008;Schwarz, Dreyfus, & Hershkowitz, 2009;Simon, 2013;Stillman, Cheung, Mason, Sheffield., Bharatah, & Ueno, 2009;Tomasello, Carpenter, Call, Behne, & Moll, 2005;Williams & Huang, 2014). The evolution of and blending of these learning theories have led organizations such as the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and the National Research Council (NRC) to suggest that mathematics instruction should shift from the current "traditional" methodologies that focus on procedure and memorization to those that incorporate interactions between and among teachers, students, and content (Stigler & Hiebert, 2004;Cohen, Raudenbush, & Ball, 2003;Jacobs, Lamb, & Phillipp, 2010;Wood, 1993) while emphasizing important mathematics ideas, evidence-based argument, social construction of mathematics, and sense-making (Billings & Fitzgerald, 2002;Corey, Peterson, Lewis, & Bukarau, 2010;Hennessey, Higley, & Chesnut, 2012;Murphy & Mason, 2006).…”
Section: Causes and Consequences Of Poor Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blending theories in this way was first seen in Cobb, Yackel, and Wood's work (1992) and continues today (Cobb, 2007;Dweck, 2015;Galbraith, Stillman, & Brown, 2010, Goos & Williams, 2013Hennessey, Higley, & Chesnut, 2012;Lerman, 2013;Rasmussen & Stephan, 2008;Schwarz, Dreyfus, & Hershkowitz, 2009;Simon, 2013;Stillman, Cheung, Mason, Sheffield., Bharatah, & Ueno, 2009;Tomasello, Carpenter, Call, Behne, & Moll, 2005;Williams & Huang, 2014). The evolution of and blending of these learning theories have led organizations such as the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and the National Research Council (NRC) to suggest that mathematics instruction should shift from the current "traditional" methodologies that focus on procedure and memorization to those that incorporate interactions between and among teachers, students, and content (Stigler & Hiebert, 2004;Cohen, Raudenbush, & Ball, 2003;Jacobs, Lamb, & Phillipp, 2010;Wood, 1993) while emphasizing important mathematics ideas, evidence-based argument, social construction of mathematics, and sense-making (Billings & Fitzgerald, 2002;Corey, Peterson, Lewis, & Bukarau, 2010;Hennessey, Higley, & Chesnut, 2012;Murphy & Mason, 2006).…”
Section: Causes and Consequences Of Poor Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%