2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112009993429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New relations for correlation functions in Navier–Stokes turbulence

Abstract: We consider the steady-state statistics of turbulence in the inertial interval. The Kolmogorov flux relation (4/5-law) is shown to be a particular case of the general relation on the current-density correlation function. Using that, we derive an analogous flux relation for compressible turbulence and a new exact relation for incompressible turbulence.PACS numbers:

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we can derive a sort of 4/5 law when we look at the trace of the two-point correlation function (i.e. the equation for the energy); see also Falkovich, Fouxon & Oz (2010). Let us also put back forcing and viscosity:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we can derive a sort of 4/5 law when we look at the trace of the two-point correlation function (i.e. the equation for the energy); see also Falkovich, Fouxon & Oz (2010). Let us also put back forcing and viscosity:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 17 describes fluid flow for the same initial Reynolds and Mach numbers but an initial disturbance with n = 1. Somewhat surprisingly, the Kolmogorov power law E C ∼ k −5/3 , seems to be robust and holds also for large Mach number when the incompressible approximation is no longer valid [50].…”
Section: Jhep04(2018)065mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…relativistic turbulence (see also [30] for compressible non-relativistic turbulence). Our notation, however, will differ: quantities evaluated at the point r 2 will have a prime, while quantities evaluated at the point r 1 will not.…”
Section: Jhep12(2015)067mentioning
confidence: 99%