2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New radiocarbon dating of the transition from the Middle to the Upper Paleolithic in Kebara Cave, Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(54 reference statements)
4
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This claim creates a contradiction with the chronostratigraphic framework based on the correlation of the three long sequences that span the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition in the region: if Rebollo et al ( 2011 ) are correct for Kebara, the Early Ahmarian would have begun there fi ve to ten millennia earlier than at Ksar' Akil (only 150 km to the north) or Üçağizli (another 240 km further north), and would have been even earlier than the Mousterian of the former and the IUP of the latter. So, either the dates for the pre-Early Ahmarian deposits of Ksar' Akil and Üçağizli are greatly rejuvenated, something that Rebollo et al ( 2011 ) do not suggest, or their interpretation of the Kebara results is fl awed.…”
Section: Early Ahmarian: Kebaramentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This claim creates a contradiction with the chronostratigraphic framework based on the correlation of the three long sequences that span the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition in the region: if Rebollo et al ( 2011 ) are correct for Kebara, the Early Ahmarian would have begun there fi ve to ten millennia earlier than at Ksar' Akil (only 150 km to the north) or Üçağizli (another 240 km further north), and would have been even earlier than the Mousterian of the former and the IUP of the latter. So, either the dates for the pre-Early Ahmarian deposits of Ksar' Akil and Üçağizli are greatly rejuvenated, something that Rebollo et al ( 2011 ) do not suggest, or their interpretation of the Kebara results is fl awed.…”
Section: Early Ahmarian: Kebaramentioning
confidence: 95%
“…So, either the dates for the pre-Early Ahmarian deposits of Ksar' Akil and Üçağizli are greatly rejuvenated, something that Rebollo et al ( 2011 ) do not suggest, or their interpretation of the Kebara results is fl awed.…”
Section: Early Ahmarian: Kebaramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first published dates for the deposits from Kebara Level D place the deposits between 41,000 BP and 30,000 BP (uncalibrated) (Broecker and Kulp, 1957;Vogel and Waterbolk, 1963). Although a further series of dates was published after the 1996 excavations (BarYosef et al, 1996) a more recent publication retested dating of the archaeological levels from the terrace using ultra-filtration and places the Upper Paleolithic IV (Layer D) between 47/46.000 cal BP (Rebollo et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Human Remains From El-wad Cavementioning
confidence: 99%