2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New quantum chemistry-based descriptors for better prediction of melting point and viscosity of ionic liquids

Abstract: Ionic liquids (ILs) are an emerging group of chemical compounds which possess promising properties such as having negligible vapor pressure. These so called designer solvents have the potential to replace volatile organic compounds in industrial applications. A large number of ILs, through the combination of different cations and anions, can potentially be synthesized. In this context, it will be useful to intelligently design customized ILs through computer-aided methods. Practical limitations dictate that an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantum mechanical descriptors have met with reasonable success in modelling a number of IL properties [44]. While previous studies [14,20,27,33] have made use of ab initio methods as a starting point for descriptor generation, here, we employ molecular descriptors [45] obtained from computationally low-cost PM6 [46] calculations. The initial structures of the ions were drawn using the MarvinSketch[47] software and subsequently converted to threedimensions using OpenBabel [48] (based on the Universal Force Field [49]).…”
Section: Molecular Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum mechanical descriptors have met with reasonable success in modelling a number of IL properties [44]. While previous studies [14,20,27,33] have made use of ab initio methods as a starting point for descriptor generation, here, we employ molecular descriptors [45] obtained from computationally low-cost PM6 [46] calculations. The initial structures of the ions were drawn using the MarvinSketch[47] software and subsequently converted to threedimensions using OpenBabel [48] (based on the Universal Force Field [49]).…”
Section: Molecular Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GC method has been applied individually or coupled with other theoretical models to estimate the physicochemical properties of organic solvents and ILs, for example, critical properties and normal boiling temperature, 32 melting temperature, [33][34][35][36][37][38] density, 39 and viscosity. 40 It has also been applied to estimate the properties of DESs. Shahbaz and co-workers 23,41 estimated the density and surface tension of DESs through the critical properties of DESs, which were determined using Lydersen-Joback-Reid's group contribution method 42 and Lee-Kesler mixing rules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models include predictive quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models, molecular docking, structure–activity relationship (SAR) systems, read‐across models, physiology‐based pharmacokinetic models, and quantitative toxicity–toxicity relationship (QTTR) models . In addition to toxicity predictions, these models have been successful in forecasting various physicochemical properties of ILs, such as melting points, surface tensions, infinite dilution activity coefficients, viscosities, conductivities, solubilities, glass transition temperatures, and decomposition temperatures …”
Section: Computational Prediction Of the Toxicity Of Ionic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models include predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, [42][43][44][45] molecular docking, [46] structure-activity relationship (SAR) systems, [47] read-across models, [48][49][50] physiology-based pharmacokinetic models, [51,52] and quantitative toxicity-toxicity relationship (QTTR) models. [53] In addition to toxicity predictions, these models have been successful in forecasting various physicochemical properties of ILs, such as melting points, [54,55] surface tensions, [56,57] infinite dilution activity coefficients, [58][59][60] viscosities, [61,62] conductivities, [63,64] solubilities, [65,66] glass transition temperatures, [64] and decomposition temperatures. [67] Determining the relationship between toxicity and structural features is one of the most basic processes of a model and this is made possible through computational chemistry.…”
Section: Computational Prediction Of the Toxicity Of Ionic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%