“…These models include predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, [42][43][44][45] molecular docking, [46] structure-activity relationship (SAR) systems, [47] read-across models, [48][49][50] physiology-based pharmacokinetic models, [51,52] and quantitative toxicity-toxicity relationship (QTTR) models. [53] In addition to toxicity predictions, these models have been successful in forecasting various physicochemical properties of ILs, such as melting points, [54,55] surface tensions, [56,57] infinite dilution activity coefficients, [58][59][60] viscosities, [61,62] conductivities, [63,64] solubilities, [65,66] glass transition temperatures, [64] and decomposition temperatures. [67] Determining the relationship between toxicity and structural features is one of the most basic processes of a model and this is made possible through computational chemistry.…”