2017
DOI: 10.5114/amsik.2017.71449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New psychoactive substances in substantive evidence in expert practice of the Department of Forensic Medicine, UJCM in the years 2010–2015

Abstract: StreszczenieCel pracy: Badanie polegało na analizie materiału dowodowego w postaci 2075 preparatów zawierających nowe substancje psychoaktywne (NPS). Materiał i metody: Materiał ten stanowiły tabletki, kapsułki, proszki, susz roślinny i kadzidełka przesłane do Katedry i Zakładu Medycyny Sądowej UJCM przez stacje sanitarno-epidemiologiczne w latach 2010-2015, celem ich identyfikacji na rzecz kontroli prawnej. Analizę badanych próbek przeprowadzono przy zastosowaniu autorskiej procedury analitycznej obejmującej … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though attempts were made to identify the NPS-taking history from the patients included in the study group, it did not seem very effective, as only in 18 cases (34% of NPS users) was it possible to obtain the substance name, of which in 15 cases (28% of NPS users) mephedrone was administered as NPS. None of the participants in the study reported using popular cannabinoids or synthetic cathinones which are mentioned in numerous publications [1,3,14,21,22]. This may have been due to the fact that in Poland NPS are treated as a collective group, referred to as legal highs or "boosters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though attempts were made to identify the NPS-taking history from the patients included in the study group, it did not seem very effective, as only in 18 cases (34% of NPS users) was it possible to obtain the substance name, of which in 15 cases (28% of NPS users) mephedrone was administered as NPS. None of the participants in the study reported using popular cannabinoids or synthetic cathinones which are mentioned in numerous publications [1,3,14,21,22]. This may have been due to the fact that in Poland NPS are treated as a collective group, referred to as legal highs or "boosters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Podobnie jak UR-144 został on wprowadzony na listę substancji kontrolowanych. Jak wynika z analizy identyfikacyjnej preparatów "dopalaczy", pentedron w latach 2012-2015 stanowił ich składnik w 33-59% [5].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Similarly to UR-144, it was included in the list of controlled substances. As shown by the identification analysis of "legal high" formulations, pentedrone accounted for 33-59% of their content between 2012 and 2015 [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations