2017
DOI: 10.1080/23809000.2017.1308808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New promising strategies in oncofertility

Abstract: Introduction Approximately 70,000 adolescent and young adults (AYA) are diagnosed with cancer each year. While advancements in treatment have led to improved prognosis and survival for patients, these same treatments can adversely affect AYA reproductive capacity. Localized treatments such as surgery and radiation therapy may affect fertility by removing or damaging reproductive organs, and systemic therapies such as chemotherapy can be toxic to gonads, (ovaries and testicles), thus affecting fertility and/or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Oocyte cryopreservation is technically more challenging than embryo cryopreservation due to oocyte high water content that makes it more prone to cryoinjury. Therefore, oocyte cryopreservation involves a higher risk of damage during the preservation process and results in lower overall pregnancy rates compared to embryo cryopreservation [ 198 ]. Some of the adverse effects of oocyte cryopreservation as summarised by Angarita et al [ 193 ] are hardening of the zona pellucida [ 199 ], egg’s meiotic spindle, cytoskeleton and cortical granular damage by ice crystals [ 200 ].…”
Section: Current Applications Of Cryopreservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oocyte cryopreservation is technically more challenging than embryo cryopreservation due to oocyte high water content that makes it more prone to cryoinjury. Therefore, oocyte cryopreservation involves a higher risk of damage during the preservation process and results in lower overall pregnancy rates compared to embryo cryopreservation [ 198 ]. Some of the adverse effects of oocyte cryopreservation as summarised by Angarita et al [ 193 ] are hardening of the zona pellucida [ 199 ], egg’s meiotic spindle, cytoskeleton and cortical granular damage by ice crystals [ 200 ].…”
Section: Current Applications Of Cryopreservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oocyte cryopreservation is substantially more expensive, costing ∼$10 000 for the collection and freezing of gametes and $800 per year for storage. 74 Fertility drugs are not included in this estimate. In New York, average costs for mastectomy total $49 149, and breast procedures other than mastectomy, such as breast augmentation, cost on average $50 886.…”
Section: Cost Of Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oncofertility research indicates that survivors of adolescent cancers have a strong desire to parent (2)(3)(4)(5). Implied more often than explicitly stated, this desire is to parent genetically-related children (6,7). With multiple options available today to become a parent (such as gamete donation, surrogacy, or adoption), how does the matter of genetic relatedness factor into cancer patients' fertility preservation (FP) decision making?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%