2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New processing technique for biodegradable kenaf composites: A simple alternative to commercial automotive parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low strength of F6 can be attributed to the weak interfacial bond between flax fiber and its matrix. This is consistent with that obtained for kenaf fiber reinforced polypropylene composite [68]. As reported by Bisanda [69], the smooth surface of untreated flax fiber provides low surface tension and low work of adhesion.…”
Section: Tensile Propertiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The low strength of F6 can be attributed to the weak interfacial bond between flax fiber and its matrix. This is consistent with that obtained for kenaf fiber reinforced polypropylene composite [68]. As reported by Bisanda [69], the smooth surface of untreated flax fiber provides low surface tension and low work of adhesion.…”
Section: Tensile Propertiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It has merits such as fast growing, high carbon dioxide absorption during cultivation, relatively high mechanical, impact, and thermal properties, compared to other natural fibers. Hence, kenaf is one of the most frequently used fiber reinforcements for natural fiber composites [10][11][12]. One of the most popular thermoplastic resins used in the composites with kenaf fibers is polypropylene [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, compared to the 90° orientation of kenaf/PP composites, the composites at a 0° orientation angle seemed to experience no misalignment, improper wettability, or any other defect which might deteriorate their mechanical performance, which was also reported by another study using similar kenaf/PP composites [ 46 ]. This was because the prepared kenaf fibers were combed rather than chemically treated, further resulting in a balanced mixture and excellent composite structure [ 46 ]. Furthermore, Figure 7 a,a1 demonstrates that the kenaf fibers experienced a fiber pull-out due to strong adhesion within the kenaf fibers and matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…A similar negative trend was also shown in the kenaf/PP composites at 90 • , which supported the lowest flexural strength recorded at a temperature of 120 • C. In addition, Figure 6a2 indicates that there were increments of tan δ due to the increase in interface bonding among the kenaf/PP composites, which later reduced the damping factor because of the decrease in mobility of the molecular chains at the kenaf/PP composites' interface [45].These are shown in Figure 7b,b1, in which at 90 • , the adhesion between the kenaf fibers and the matrix was low, with no reinforcement within the kenaf fibers as the applied load was only subjected to the polymer matrix. In contrast, compared to the 90 • orientation of kenaf/PP composites, the composites at a 0 • orientation angle seemed to experience no misalignment, improper wettability, or any other defect which might deteriorate their mechanical performance, which was also reported by another study using similar kenaf/PP composites [46]. This was because the prepared kenaf fibers were combed rather than chemically treated, further resulting in a balanced mixture and excellent composite structure [46].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 81%