2009
DOI: 10.2174/187152509787847128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Perspectives to Repair a Broken Heart

Abstract: The aim of cardiac cell therapy is to restore at least in part the functionality of the diseased or injured myocardium by the use of stem/progenitor cells. Recent clinical trials have shown the safety of cardiac cell therapy and encouraging efficacy results. A surprisingly wide range of non-myogenic cell types improves ventricular function, suggesting that benefits may result in part from mechanisms that are distinct from true myocardial regeneration. While clinical trials explore cells derived from skeletal m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the SCAMI trial showed no improvement in function and size of cardiac chamber after MNC intracoronary infusion (381 × 10 6 cells, 6.1 days after revascularization) when evaluated by cardiac MRI [60], whereas others showed limited improvement of LVEF [14]. The long-term effect is not superior to traditional pharmacological therapies [12, 61] and there is also obvious change in cardiac remodelling [60]. The effect of cell therapy is more related to paracrine effects, which operate to salvage the cells after MI rather than induce new functional tissue in or around the infarct area.…”
Section: Myocardiac Restoration Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the SCAMI trial showed no improvement in function and size of cardiac chamber after MNC intracoronary infusion (381 × 10 6 cells, 6.1 days after revascularization) when evaluated by cardiac MRI [60], whereas others showed limited improvement of LVEF [14]. The long-term effect is not superior to traditional pharmacological therapies [12, 61] and there is also obvious change in cardiac remodelling [60]. The effect of cell therapy is more related to paracrine effects, which operate to salvage the cells after MI rather than induce new functional tissue in or around the infarct area.…”
Section: Myocardiac Restoration Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of clinically relevant cardiovascular disease results from the death of cardiac cells that are replaced by noncontractile fibrotic tissue, thus leading to pathological ventricular remodeling and heart failure [1,2]. Therefore, an intense effort during the last decade has been focused on identifying endogenous cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) that can be expanded ex vivo and reintroduced as an autologous regenerative therapy [3,4]. A promising candidate population of resident CPCs can be readily obtained from cells that spontaneously migrate out of primary cardiac explants (explant-derived cells [EDCs]) and form cardiospheres (CSps) which recreate in vitro a niche-like microtissue [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human CPCs can be isolated with clinically compliant protocols [6] and have been tested in few clinical trials as a promising tool for cardiac regenerative medicine [7, 8]. Unfortunately, despite the positive preclinical results [9, 10], regenerative medicine still cannot be considered a strong alternative to transplantation. It has been demonstrated that only 5–10% of the injected cells can be detected after 1 day from the procedure in the damaged myocardium, meaning that many cells are lost within few hours after injection [11, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%