2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0604_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Perspectives on the Gender Stereotyping of Mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
35
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, regarding gender stereotyping, men are typically perceived as more knowledgeable, stronger, and more competent with regard to the domain used in the current study, namely Mathematics (Forgasz et al 2004). Hence, learners should be more motivated to listen to a male speaker and put more effort toward sense-making activities, which, in turn, should improve learning outcomes.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…On the one hand, regarding gender stereotyping, men are typically perceived as more knowledgeable, stronger, and more competent with regard to the domain used in the current study, namely Mathematics (Forgasz et al 2004). Hence, learners should be more motivated to listen to a male speaker and put more effort toward sense-making activities, which, in turn, should improve learning outcomes.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, no such effects were found for grade 4-6 students who observed a male or female model solving fraction problems . Although mathematical tasks are typically more associated with males than females (Forgasz et al 2004;Stewart-Williams 2002), young children do not yet seem to hold this association, which becomes stronger during adolescence (Steffens et al 2010; see also Ceci et al 2014). In other words, the 10 year olds in the study by Schunk et al (1987) More recent studies also suggest mixed findings, however.…”
Section: Model-observer Similaritymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Based on the model-observer similarity hypothesis, we could expect novice learners to identify more with a same-gender model relative to an opposite-gender one and therefore show cognitive and affective benefits when learning from a same-gender model (Schunk 1987). However, based on research with animated pedagogical agents (e.g., Arroyo et al 2009;Moreno et al 2002) and dynamic visualizations with a voice-over (Lee et al 2007; Rodicio 2012), we might expect that novices benefit more from a male model than a female model because mathematical tasks are associated more with males than females (Forgasz et al 2004;Stewart-Williams 2002). Moreover, because the confidence that learners have in their own capabilities is associated with how much effort they invest (Bandura 1977;Salomon 1983Salomon , 1984, differences in perceived capabilities across conditions could affect how much mental effort students invest during example study.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender-linked stereotypes of domain-related abilities are a plausible candidate for explaining the discrepancy between gender differences found for achievement and those for emotions. It might be that domain-related beliefs and stereotypes directly influence girls' and boys' academic self-perceptions in mathematics, over and above the information provided by formal feedback of achievement in terms of grades (e.g., Davies & Spencer, 2005;Forgasz, Leder, & Kloosterman, 2004; see also Goetz, Frenzel, Hall, & Pekrun, in press, for a similar argumentation). For example, females often think they have to work harder than boys to achieve good results in mathematics (Lupart, Cannon, & Telfer, 2004).…”
Section: Gender Differences In Mean Levels Of Experienced Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%