2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New performance indices for 6-dof UPS and 3-dof RPR parallel manipulators

Abstract: In this paper we introduce two new posture-dependent performance indices for 6-dof UPS and 3-dof RPR parallel manipulators. One is based on an object-oriented metric in the workspace (end-effector dependent) and the other one takes the angular velocities of the passive joints into consideration (end-effector independent). Both newly defined indices are invariant under rigid-body motions and similarities, they have a geometric meaning, and they can be computed in real time. Moreover these indices can also be us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nawratil proposed two new performance indices: an endeffector dependent index defined through operation ellipsoid and an end-effector independent index called control number (CTN). Optimal designs of 6-DoF and 3-DoF parallel manipulators are investigated based on the newly defined indices [8]. Jiang investigated the optimal design of generalized Gough-Stewart platforms based on an analytical dynamic isotropy measure proposed from the inverse mass matrix in joint space [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nawratil proposed two new performance indices: an endeffector dependent index defined through operation ellipsoid and an end-effector independent index called control number (CTN). Optimal designs of 6-DoF and 3-DoF parallel manipulators are investigated based on the newly defined indices [8]. Jiang investigated the optimal design of generalized Gough-Stewart platforms based on an analytical dynamic isotropy measure proposed from the inverse mass matrix in joint space [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been various kinds of kinematic performance indices, including the manipulability measure (Hong and Kim, 2000;Mansouri and Ouali, 2009), the condition number (Nawratil, 2009), the dexterity index (Angeles and LopezCajun, 1992;Li and Xu, 2007), and the global performance index (Liu et al, 2006). Compared with the kinematic performance indices, the dynamic performance index is seldom studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%