2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10443-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Partial Volume Estimation Methods for MRI MP2RAGE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects can be lessened in sub-1 mm isotropic resolution images acquired with high field MRI (Lusebrink et al, 2013 ; Tardif et al, 2015 ). It would also be useful in future implementations of myelinated cortical thickness mapping to correct for partial volume effects using more sophisticated strategies than simply changing the WM fuzzy c-means membership function, as we did in this study (Pham and Bazin, 2004 ; Duche et al, 2014 ; Shafee et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These effects can be lessened in sub-1 mm isotropic resolution images acquired with high field MRI (Lusebrink et al, 2013 ; Tardif et al, 2015 ). It would also be useful in future implementations of myelinated cortical thickness mapping to correct for partial volume effects using more sophisticated strategies than simply changing the WM fuzzy c-means membership function, as we did in this study (Pham and Bazin, 2004 ; Duche et al, 2014 ; Shafee et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In previous short publications [Duché et al, ], we proposed a new partial volume model to estimate PV from MP2RAGE data. In this model, the parameters contributing to the signal are expressed as the tissue properties T=true{ρ,T1,T2,T2true} and the sequence parameters Φ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most models rely on a linear combination of pure tissue signal intensities. Recently, it has been shown that the linear PV model could not be adapted for MP2RAGE data since the bias free image results from a non‐linear combination of two images [Duché et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%