2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03764.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New oral antithrombotics: a need for laboratory monitoring. For

Abstract: See also Bounameaux H, Reber G. New oral antithrombotics: a need for laboratory monitoring. Against. This issue, pp 627–30.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5] It has been surmised, however, that certain patients could benefit from dose adaptation. 22,23 This raises the question of whether dose adaptation should be restricted to certain categories or whether it could improve the results with direct inhibitors so that these become better than the -admittedly not ideal -results of prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists. This article deals with a partial problem pertaining to this question, viz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] It has been surmised, however, that certain patients could benefit from dose adaptation. 22,23 This raises the question of whether dose adaptation should be restricted to certain categories or whether it could improve the results with direct inhibitors so that these become better than the -admittedly not ideal -results of prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists. This article deals with a partial problem pertaining to this question, viz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptibility to venous thrombosis (VT) is heterogeneous, involving multiple genetic and environmental risk factors [1].…”
Section: Disclosure Of Conflict Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Arias-Salgado EG, Tao J, Gonzalez-Manchon C, Butta N, Vicente V, Ayuso MS, Parilla R. Nonsense mutation in exon-19 of GPIIb associated with thrombasthenic phenotype. In the debate published in the April issue of this journal, the authors give us a series of important reasons for and against monitoring during treatment with the new oral anticoagulants [1,2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the parenteral anticoagulant of choice for more than 50 years [2][3][4]. Even though new anticoagulant drugs inhibiting thrombin (30%) and factor Xa (FXa) (70%) are under clinical development [5][6][7], UFH continues to be administered for short-term prophylaxis because it is effective, inexpensive, and a protamine sulfate antidote exists to rapidly reverse bleeding [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%