1996
DOI: 10.1117/1.600685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New optical sensing system for obtaining the three‐dimensional shape of specular objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…it is independent of the direction of view. Conversely, reflected light in case of specular surfaces significantly depends on the (Ryu and Cho, 1996;Sanderson et al, 1988). Nayar et al (1989) decomposed surface reflectance primarily into three reflection components: diffuse lobe, specular lobe and specular spike, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Surface Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…it is independent of the direction of view. Conversely, reflected light in case of specular surfaces significantly depends on the (Ryu and Cho, 1996;Sanderson et al, 1988). Nayar et al (1989) decomposed surface reflectance primarily into three reflection components: diffuse lobe, specular lobe and specular spike, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Surface Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive review of reconstruction methods for specular surfaces can be found in the work by Ihrke et al (2010). The concept of single camera viewpoint and reflection of planar target at two different positions (Bonfort et al, 2006), shape from polarization technique (Morel et al, 2006), deflectometry technique (Chambard and Chalvidan, 2009), optical sensing system using parabolic mirror (Ryu and Cho, 1996), represent some of the earlier efforts to recover the shape of specular surfaces. Additionally, Maki, 2005 also used the concept of geotensity (geometrically corresponding pixel intensity) for 3D surface reconstruction of moving a object in the presence of specular reflection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was still residual error in the dataset which may affect the final result. The outliers may be caused by the characteristics of the measured surface such as specular reflection of the reflectance light [27] which is considered to influence the optical sensor. …”
Section: Measurement Of An F-theta Lens Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was still residual error in the dataset which may affect the final result. The outliers may be caused by the characteristics of the measured surface such as specular reflection of the reflectance light [27] which is considered to influence the optical sensor. After the outliers were removed, the raw data were processed with Gaussian process modelling and the mean surface was obtained together with the associated uncertainty.…”
Section: Measurement Of An F-theta Lens Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a promising alternative, deflectometry enables overcoming the shortcomings in the foregoing techniques, and various laser scanning devices, based on its principle, have been fabricated [17][18][19][20][21] , but the point scanning implementations with these devices hinder them from measuring very large surfaces. For removing this limitation, the diffusive screen of a planar monitor (or a retroreflective screen coupled with a projector) is employed as structured light source so that the whole-field information can be obtained [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%