2014
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New‐onset diabetes after renal transplantation

Abstract: Renal transplantation has important benefits in people with end-stage renal disease, with improvements in mortality, morbidity and quality of life. Whilst significant advances in transplantation techniques and immunosuppressive regimens have led to improvements in short-term outcomes, longer-term outcomes have not improved dramatically. New-onset diabetes after transplantation appears to be a major factor in morbidity and cardiovascular mortality in renal transplant recipients. The diagnosis of new-onset diabe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(130 reference statements)
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to the question of what are the factors affecting the improvement in glucose tolerance, insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. Considering the risk factors for NODAT, recipient characteristics such as age, sex and the use of immunosuppression and glucocorticoids might affect glucose tolerance . In the present study, there were no differences in age, sex or glucocorticoid dosage between the non‐amelioration group and the amelioration group (Table ), and no significant differences in the changes in glucose tolerance were observed between the tacrolimus group and the cyclosporin A group (Tables S1 and S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This leads to the question of what are the factors affecting the improvement in glucose tolerance, insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. Considering the risk factors for NODAT, recipient characteristics such as age, sex and the use of immunosuppression and glucocorticoids might affect glucose tolerance . In the present study, there were no differences in age, sex or glucocorticoid dosage between the non‐amelioration group and the amelioration group (Table ), and no significant differences in the changes in glucose tolerance were observed between the tacrolimus group and the cyclosporin A group (Tables S1 and S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…In the present study, there were no differences in age, sex or glucocorticoid dosage between the non‐amelioration group and the amelioration group (Table ), and no significant differences in the changes in glucose tolerance were observed between the tacrolimus group and the cyclosporin A group (Tables S1 and S2). Although pre‐transplant weight and post‐transplant weight gain have significant impacts on the development of NODAT , no significant differences in BMI before or after transplantation were observed between the non‐amelioration group and the amelioration group (Table and Table S3). Also, tissue insensitivity to the action of insulin is reportedly present in people with advanced chronic renal failure and is the predominant factor contributing to glucose tolerance in uraemia ; however, no significant differences in renal function before and after transplantation were observed between the non‐amelioration group and the amelioration group (Table and Table S3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both DM and PTDM are inflammatory states [11] and hence increase the risk of DGF. However, hyperglycaemia may reflect rather than cause the inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Some but not all studies suggest that new-onset diabetes after transplantation has an adverse effect on graft survival and may increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but little is known about the microvascular complications of this group of patients. 5 Screening for complications is recommended once diabetes has been diagnosed after transplantation. 6 Diabetes occurring after transplantation could provide a more precise date of onset of type 2 diabetes than is usually determined in ordinary clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%