1990
DOI: 10.1086/169382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New observations and gravitational lens models of the Cloverleaf quasar H1413 + 117

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes are observed in all components, indicating that the time scale of the intrinsic line profile variation is longer than the time delays between the four images. In fact, the longest time delay is not larger than one month according to the observations of Goicoecha & Shalyapin (2010) and in agreement with models 1 (Kayser et al 1990;Chae & Turnshek 1999).…”
Section: Evidence For Microlensingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These changes are observed in all components, indicating that the time scale of the intrinsic line profile variation is longer than the time delays between the four images. In fact, the longest time delay is not larger than one month according to the observations of Goicoecha & Shalyapin (2010) and in agreement with models 1 (Kayser et al 1990;Chae & Turnshek 1999).…”
Section: Evidence For Microlensingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Theoretical estimations of the time delays have led to values of about several weeks (Kayser et al 1990). The first light curves of the individual lensed images of H1413+117 in the Bessel V filter have been reported by Arnould et al (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we should note that the only work dedicated to the observational determination of the time delays between the components Kayser et al (1990), respectively. of the Clover Leaf has been performed by Goicoechea & Shalyapin (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the images, D, (see Chartas et al (2004)), has been seen to exhibit variability consistent with microlensing (Angonin et al 1990;Kayser et al 1990;Østensen 1997), with Hutsemékers (1993) suggesting that prominent differences in the absorption profiles of the images might be due to selective microlensing of absorbing clouds, with the scale size of these clouds being smaller than the continuum-forming region. It was conceded, however, that this would require a very precise lensing configuration.…”
Section: H1413+1143mentioning
confidence: 86%