2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3589-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New molecular tools for meningitis diagnostics in Ethiopia – a necessary step towards improving antimicrobial prescription

Abstract: BackgroundMeningitis remains a top cause of premature death and loss of disability-adjusted life years in low-income countries. In resource-limited settings, proper laboratory diagnostics are often scarce and knowledge about national and local epidemiology is limited. Misdiagnosis, incorrect treatment and overuse of antibiotics are potential consequences, especially for viral meningitis.MethodsA prospective study was conducted over three months in a teaching hospital in Ethiopia with limited laboratory resourc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
20
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the small number of studies on FA-M/E use currently available (42 studies retrieved with the Mesh terms “FilmArray” and “meningitis” on 17 July, 2019), their comparison is limited by highly diverse study designs, e.g., CSF selection criteria [11,12]; focus on CSF specimens positive or negative by other methods [13,14], on specific population defined by age or clinical condition [1520], on specific pathogens [17,2124]; result comparison with other approaches for all or specific discordant results [9,18] or no comparison (most studies). Most of these studies were retrospective, and our literature review only identified four large prospective studies [8,11,25,26]. We present the fifth study on prospective CSF testing with the FA-M/E panel and show an overall positive rate of 12% after exclusion of non-clinically relevant results, consistent with the aforementioned studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the small number of studies on FA-M/E use currently available (42 studies retrieved with the Mesh terms “FilmArray” and “meningitis” on 17 July, 2019), their comparison is limited by highly diverse study designs, e.g., CSF selection criteria [11,12]; focus on CSF specimens positive or negative by other methods [13,14], on specific population defined by age or clinical condition [1520], on specific pathogens [17,2124]; result comparison with other approaches for all or specific discordant results [9,18] or no comparison (most studies). Most of these studies were retrospective, and our literature review only identified four large prospective studies [8,11,25,26]. We present the fifth study on prospective CSF testing with the FA-M/E panel and show an overall positive rate of 12% after exclusion of non-clinically relevant results, consistent with the aforementioned studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The FilmArray system automatically interprets the three results obtained as three independent melting curves to give a unique final result. Despite high-level miniaturized technology, use of the system does not require any specific skills in molecular-based methods [8] requiring only microbiological safety precautions. Handling time and time-to-results reported by the manufacturer are 2 minutes and 1 hour, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, a total of 200 µL of each CSF sample were required to run the assay; the test process includes a nucleic acid extraction/purification stage, a first round of highly multiplexed amplification of all targets, followed by a nested-amplification of each target triplicated tested on the array. The FilmArray ® software system automatically interprets the three results obtained as three independent melting curves to give a unique final result 7 . The master list includes: E. coli K1, H. influenzae, L.monocytogenes, N. meningitidis, S.agalactiae, S. pneumoniae, CMV (Cytomegalovirus), EV (Enterovirus), Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), Human Herpes virus 6 (HHV-6), Human Parechovirus (HPeV), Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) and C. neoformans/gatti.…”
Section: Molecular Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a molecular tool that allows the simultaneous detection of 14 pathogens (bacteria, viruses and one fungus). The entire process is fully automated and takes approximately one hour to release the results 7 . In this study, we have documented the performance of FA-M/E in CSF samples of patients with suspected meningitis or meningoencephalitis infections in the context of a tertiary referral hospital, comparing the results obtained by this molecular method with traditional testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 These techniques could be of special importance for both clinical routine and surveillance purposes in settings where culture of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is not available. 12 A rapid molecular multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel for CNS infections has been studied in low- and middle-income countries with a positivity rate of 10% in a general population 13,14 and a higher detection rate in a cohort of HIV-infected patients. 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%