2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Modified Model for Estimating the Peak Shear Strength of Rock Mass Containing Nonconsecutive Joint Based on a Simulated Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As underground engineering has progressed to vast and burial depths and spans, the stress state of the rock mass has become more complex. Rock mass collapses are common, with tensile, compressive-shear, and tensile-shear failure being three common failure types [1]. Mechanical fatigue can be viewed as a process of gradual accumulation of damage in rock specimens under stress or strain, a process that leads to changes in the structure and properties of rock specimens and the creation and expansion of cracks and fractures [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As underground engineering has progressed to vast and burial depths and spans, the stress state of the rock mass has become more complex. Rock mass collapses are common, with tensile, compressive-shear, and tensile-shear failure being three common failure types [1]. Mechanical fatigue can be viewed as a process of gradual accumulation of damage in rock specimens under stress or strain, a process that leads to changes in the structure and properties of rock specimens and the creation and expansion of cracks and fractures [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rock mass joint surface is a two-dimensional geological interface with a particular direction, large extension, and small thickness of various structural relics (including faults, joints, bedding, and fractured zones) produced in the rock mass under the action of tectonic stress. The dynamic response of a rock mass is largely restricted by its joint surface (Wang and Zhang, 1982;Fox et al, 1998;Siad 2003;Liu 2017;Hu et al, 2020;Cui et al, 2021;Fw et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021). Therefore, the study of the dynamic characteristics of the joint surface, especially the dynamic shear characteristics, is an important prerequisite for the analysis of the dynamic response of a rock mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initiation, propagation, and coalescence of multiple cracks eventually evolve into macroscopic failure 1,2 . Currently, it is widely accepted that the geomechanical behaviors of rock mass are significantly impacted by the size, shape, number, and distribution of these defects 3–7 . Especially, under disturbed stress conditions, for example, earthquake, excavation, blast vibration, drilling, and rock cutting, rock structure deteriorates quickly due to the existence of these natural flaws.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Currently, it is widely accepted that the geomechanical behaviors of rock mass are significantly impacted by the size, shape, number, and distribution of these defects. [3][4][5][6][7] Especially, under disturbed stress conditions, for example, earthquake, excavation, blast vibration, drilling, and rock cutting, rock structure deteriorates quickly due to the existence of these natural flaws. It is worth noting that the holes excavated in rock engineering, such as tunnels, shafts, and roadways, can also be considered as artificial defects formed in the rock mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%