2012
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-012-9851-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New model for the indirect determination of the tensile stress–strain curve of concrete by means of the Brazilian test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the BT, the specimen must fail along the vertical line between compression points; otherwise, the observed failure mode is considered invalid (Li and Wong 2013). The test typically ends with a sudden, violent failure of the specimen when it reaches the maximum load due to the propagation of an unstable crack (Carmona and Aguado 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the BT, the specimen must fail along the vertical line between compression points; otherwise, the observed failure mode is considered invalid (Li and Wong 2013). The test typically ends with a sudden, violent failure of the specimen when it reaches the maximum load due to the propagation of an unstable crack (Carmona and Aguado 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can gain an idea of its impact if one considers that the use of concrete test specimens has been standardized into norms in various countries, such as UNE-EN 12390-6, ASTM C-496, and CPC6 (Carmona and Aguado 2012). In 1951, the BT was standardized in the Japanese industry as a test method for determining the TS of concrete (Kourkoulis et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The load (P) applied on two diametrically opposite generatrices produces vertical compressive and horizontal tensile stresses at the centre of the cube as follows [26][27][28]:…”
Section: Tensile Split Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22]. Specimen/test #5, reported in Denneman [21], as well as specimens/tests #6 and #7, analyzed by Carmona and Aguado [13], refer to plain concrete. Moreover, specimens #5 and #6 have again diameter d = 150 mm and length L = 300 mm whereas specimen #7 keeping L = 300 mm has d = 300 mm.…”
Section: Case Study #2: Splitting Tensile Test On Cylindrical Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%