2021
DOI: 10.18435/vamp29370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New mid-cervical vertebral morphotype of Spinosauridae from the Kem Kem Group of Morocco

Abstract: An unusual mid-cervical vertebra belonging to a large spinosaurid from the Cenomanian Kem Kem Group of Morocco is described. It is compared to the characteristic morphology of each reconstructed cervical position in Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, based on a recent composite reconstruction that incorporates most previously referred material from this unit. Rather than conforming to any of the previously identified cervical positions in its morphology, the specimen displays a unique combination of mid-cervical charact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, differing topologies recovered within Spinosaurinae indicate a continued lack of in-group resolution. This impacts the perceived number of coeval North African spinosaurines, a topic that has attracted considerable debate in recent years 7,22,27,84 . The polytomous, parsimony-based strict consensus, coupled with the insignificance of the constrained analysis performed to group North African specimens (see SI), are unable to support or reject the existence of a spinosaurine subclade incorporating all North African material-a topology required to corroborate the proposed synonymy of these specimens (i.e.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, differing topologies recovered within Spinosaurinae indicate a continued lack of in-group resolution. This impacts the perceived number of coeval North African spinosaurines, a topic that has attracted considerable debate in recent years 7,22,27,84 . The polytomous, parsimony-based strict consensus, coupled with the insignificance of the constrained analysis performed to group North African specimens (see SI), are unable to support or reject the existence of a spinosaurine subclade incorporating all North African material-a topology required to corroborate the proposed synonymy of these specimens (i.e.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%