2014
DOI: 10.21236/ada603833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Micro-Method for Prediction of Vapor Pressure of Energetic Materials

Abstract: Approve for public release; distribution unlimited.ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vapor pressure of samples was obtained by thermogravimetric analysis (TA Q500 TGA) at selected temperatures using the method of Pesce-Rodriguez and Klier. 47 As a reference and crosscheck, this procedure yielded an estimated value of ΔH sub = 130.3 kJ/mol for RDX, in excellent agreement with the value of 130.1 kJ/mol reported by Rosen and Dickinson 48 and in good agreement with the 127.1 kJ/mol value suggested by O ̈stmarek et al from their critical review on vapor pressure of explosives. 49 ■ MODELING DETAILS Single Molecule Modeling (M-DFT).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Proceduressupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vapor pressure of samples was obtained by thermogravimetric analysis (TA Q500 TGA) at selected temperatures using the method of Pesce-Rodriguez and Klier. 47 As a reference and crosscheck, this procedure yielded an estimated value of ΔH sub = 130.3 kJ/mol for RDX, in excellent agreement with the value of 130.1 kJ/mol reported by Rosen and Dickinson 48 and in good agreement with the 127.1 kJ/mol value suggested by O ̈stmarek et al from their critical review on vapor pressure of explosives. 49 ■ MODELING DETAILS Single Molecule Modeling (M-DFT).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Proceduressupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The experimental heats of sublimation of BODN and BIDN were derived from the slopes [ R 2 = 0.9959 (BODN) and 0.9963 (BIDN)] of Clausius–Clapeyron plots, ln­( P ) vs T , where P and T represent the pressure and temperature, respectively. The vapor pressure of samples was obtained by thermogravimetric analysis (TA Q500 TGA) at selected temperatures using the method of Pesce-Rodriguez and Klier . As a reference and crosscheck, this procedure yielded an estimated value of Δ H sub = 130.3 kJ/mol for RDX, in excellent agreement with the value of 130.1 kJ/mol reported by Rosen and Dickinson and in good agreement with the 127.1 kJ/mol value suggested by Östmarek et al from their critical review on vapor pressure of explosives …”
Section: Experimental Proceduressupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Boddu [27] predicted vapor pressure for CL-20 at 100 8C to be 5 orders of magnitude higher than at 25 8C (log VP = À14.1 torr at 25 8C and À9.15 at 100 8C). Pesce-Rodriguez and Klier [28] predicted similar values (À12.5 torr and À7.2 torr, respectively, at 25 and 100 8C). While sublimation of CL-20 from a pressed charge would be expected to be small, nonnegligible loss from a loose molding powder would be expected -resulting in a higher relative amount of binder to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 CL-20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%