2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.319.419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Methods to Evaluate Diesel Smoke from Inspection/Maintenance Vehicles Using Integration of Smoke Emissions over a Measurement Cycle of Snap-Acceleration Test at no Load

Abstract: Each country regularly inspects smoke emissions from diesel vehicles. The most common method is a snap acceleration test at no load. Currently, the representative smoke value of a tested vehicle is decided by averaging three peak values which correspond to three consecutive measurement cycles. The biggest problem of the current method of determining the representative smoke of tested vehicles based on the averaging 3 consecutive peak values is that it varies enormously according to how the driver pushes the ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smoke emitted from the tailpipe is then measured (SAE J1667, 1996. The problem with the snap-acceleration method is that the measured smoke value varies depending on the pattern with which the driver depresses the accelerator pedal (Lee, 2013). Moreover, because diesel vehicles' driving modes occur typically in a loaded condition, the snap-acceleration method cannot accurately reflect the actual operational conditions of diesel vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smoke emitted from the tailpipe is then measured (SAE J1667, 1996. The problem with the snap-acceleration method is that the measured smoke value varies depending on the pattern with which the driver depresses the accelerator pedal (Lee, 2013). Moreover, because diesel vehicles' driving modes occur typically in a loaded condition, the snap-acceleration method cannot accurately reflect the actual operational conditions of diesel vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%