2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New methods to assess water diffusion in amorphous matrices during storage and drying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drying curves of air drying and vacuum foam drying (Figure ) showed a similar progression with a characteristic bend in drying velocity at about 8% to 11% w.b, most likely representing the moisture range where the material state is moving towards glass transition. Near glass transition the material viscosity increases over several magnitudes, abruptly limiting the diffusion rate of residual water (Gianfrancesco and others ). The total drying duration differed for both methods by 3% to 7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drying curves of air drying and vacuum foam drying (Figure ) showed a similar progression with a characteristic bend in drying velocity at about 8% to 11% w.b, most likely representing the moisture range where the material state is moving towards glass transition. Near glass transition the material viscosity increases over several magnitudes, abruptly limiting the diffusion rate of residual water (Gianfrancesco and others ). The total drying duration differed for both methods by 3% to 7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b. Such behavior could be explained by increasing material viscosity near the glass transition temperature that abruptly increases material resistance to water diffusion (Gianfrancesco et al 2012). The summary of all drying parameters of honey powders is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Vacuum Drying In a Foamed Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For amorphous sugar or carbohydrate solutions the drying rates (and the diffusion coefficients) decreases with an increase in the molecular mass of carbohydrates [4][5][6][7][8][9]14,15]. The molecular mass of the simulated lemon juice is much smaller than that of maltodextrin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…t: drying time [s], d s :pure solid density [kg/m 3 ], R s :thickness of slab [m], W s : solid weight in the absence of water [kg], A:dr ying area [m 2 ]. Cur ves are fitted cur ves using the following three-parameter equation, X=exp [(b+acτ)/(1+ acτ)][4][5][6][7][8]14,15]. For maltodextrin and sucrose only fitted cur ves are shown for the sake of clarity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%