2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New methodology for scaling hydrodynamic data from a 2D-fluidized bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact is reflected in the large research effort addressed to develop new measurement techniques and theoretical approaches to improve fluidized bed hydrodynamic engineering (Hallow and Daw, 1994;Schouten et al, 1996;van Ommen et al, 2000;Coppens and van Ommen, 2003;Gheorghiu et al, 2003;Briongos and Guardiola, 2005). The dynamic measurement consists on time series collected by several measurement methods (Werther, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This fact is reflected in the large research effort addressed to develop new measurement techniques and theoretical approaches to improve fluidized bed hydrodynamic engineering (Hallow and Daw, 1994;Schouten et al, 1996;van Ommen et al, 2000;Coppens and van Ommen, 2003;Gheorghiu et al, 2003;Briongos and Guardiola, 2005). The dynamic measurement consists on time series collected by several measurement methods (Werther, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More recently, the experimental results of Shen et al [14] corroborate these wall effects. In a different study, Briongos and Guardiola [26] proposed a new method based on chaos scale up techniques to scale 2D hydrodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coroneo, Mazzei, Lettieri, Paglianti, and Montante (2011) predicted the main features of binary segregating fluidized beds of particles differing in size and density. However, to simplify the theoretical models and reduce the computational time, the three-dimensional fluidized beds in their simulations were all simplified as two-dimensional, which could lead to relatively large deviations because of the different influences of the bed walls, the geometry on the flow pattern, and other aspects (Asegehegn, Schreiber, & Krautz, 2012;Van der Hoef, van Sint Annaland, & Kuipers, 2004;Villa Briongos & Guardiola, 2005). Moreover, the reactors they modeled are all conventional bubbling fluidized beds having uniform distributions, rather than spout fluidized beds with unique flow patterns.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 98%