2006
DOI: 10.1080/15472450600793586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Methodology for Estimating Reliability in Transportation Networks with Degraded Link Capacities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the statistical (or numerical) methods, normal, lognormal, truncated normal/lognormal, Gamma, and Weibull distributions [3][4][5] are widely applied to describe travel time reliability (variability). Due to the complexity of urban traffic conditions, a single distribution model could not well represent the travel time distribution of an urban road.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the statistical (or numerical) methods, normal, lognormal, truncated normal/lognormal, Gamma, and Weibull distributions [3][4][5] are widely applied to describe travel time reliability (variability). Due to the complexity of urban traffic conditions, a single distribution model could not well represent the travel time distribution of an urban road.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of reliability measures, various probability distributions have been proposed to describe the distribution of travel time. By far the most widely used are the Normal, Lognormal, Gamma, and Weibull distributions; many studies provide discussions and suggestions about the use of these models for fitting travel time data under different circumstances (Al-Deek and Emam, 2006;Arroyo and Kornhauser, 2005;Mazloumi et al, 2010;Polus, 1979;Pu, 2011;Rakha et al, 2006). Limitations of these traditional distributions have also been recognized and a number of alternatives have been explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This arises from fluctuations in demand, manner of road operations, and geometry of the road. Non-recurrent congestion, in contrast, is triggered by random events where the capacity of a road is temporarily reduced, by traffic incidents, work zones, and adverse weather, and where peak demand is higher than normal as a result of special events (Lomax et al, 2003;Skabardonis et al, 2003;Cambridge Systematics Inc. and Texas Transportation Institute, 2005;Al-Deek and Emam, 2006).…”
Section: Recurrent and Non-recurrent Congestionmentioning
confidence: 99%