2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ps.1949-1204.0000296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Method of Modeling the Behavior of Buried Steel Distribution Pipes Subjected to Reverse Faulting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…An insufficient driving force due to pressure relief increases the risk of blockage. To evaluate the sealing performance of cups based on the distribution of contact stress, a rigorous 3 D nonlinear numerical simulation model was established in this study 28–30 . A nonlinear stress‐strain relationship of rubber materials was considered by performing a uniaxial tension test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An insufficient driving force due to pressure relief increases the risk of blockage. To evaluate the sealing performance of cups based on the distribution of contact stress, a rigorous 3 D nonlinear numerical simulation model was established in this study 28–30 . A nonlinear stress‐strain relationship of rubber materials was considered by performing a uniaxial tension test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the pipe will endure larger displacements while the critical strain and buckling will increase as well. Rofooei et al (2018) in another research proposed a new method for modeling of buried steel pipes behavior under reverse faulting. The suggested method was verified using the results of four real-scale experimental tests and finite-element modeling of 4 and 6 inch buried steel gas pipelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang, Zhao, et al, 2016a). Η μεθοδολογία αυτή χρησιμοποιείται συχνά για την επέκταση πειραματικών δεδομένων, καθώς επιτρέπει τη μεταβολή πολλών παραμέτρων (Fadaee et al, 2020;Robert et al, 2016;Rofooei et al, 2018;Tsatsis et al, 2019) (Joshi et al, 2011;Melissianos et al, 2016Melissianos et al, , 2020Temis & Strom, 2019;Uckan et al, 2015). Οι Chatzidakis et al (2022a) μελέτησαν τη συμπεριφορά θαμμένων αγωγών υπό τη διάρρηξη δευτερογενών ρηγμάτων χρησιμοποιώντας αντίστοιχα προσομοιώματα.…”
Section: προσομοίωση της καταπόνησης αγωγώνunclassified
“…Το αριθμητικό προσομοίωμα που παρουσιάζεται στην προηγούμενη Ενότητα βασίζεται στη μεθοδολογία που προτείνεται από τον αμερικανικό κανονισμό ALA (2001). Η μεθοδολογία αυτή έχει συγκριθεί στο παρελθόν με πειραματικά αποτελέσματα παρουσιάζοντας ικανοποιητική ακρίβεια (Jalali et al, 2016;Rofooei et al, 2018;Saiyar et al, 2016). Gawande et al, 2019;Ni, Moore, et al, 2018;Vazouras et al, 2015).…”
Section: σύγκριση με πειραματικά αποτελέσματαunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation