2013
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/65.6.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Method of Estimating Binary's Mass Ratios by Using Superhumps

Abstract: We propose a new dynamical method of estimating binary's mass ratios by using the period of superhumps in SU UMa-type dwarf novae during the growing stage (the stage A superhumps). This method is based on the working hypothesis that the period of superhumps in the growing stage is determined by the dynamical precession rate at the 3W1 resonance radius, and is suggested in our new interpretation of the superhump period evolution during a superoutburst (2013, PASJ, 65, 95). By comparing objects having known mass… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
135
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
9
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have analyzed more than 500 superoutbursts of SU UMa-type dwarf novae. These results have been published by T. Kato et al (see Kato et al (2009);Kato et al (2010); Kato et al (2012); Kato et al (2013); Kato et al (2014)). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We have analyzed more than 500 superoutbursts of SU UMa-type dwarf novae. These results have been published by T. Kato et al (see Kato et al (2009);Kato et al (2010); Kato et al (2012); Kato et al (2013); Kato et al (2014)). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For the white dwarf channel, we chose the relation Table 2 lists the simulated positive superhump periods for each simulated stage and each evolutionary channel. As shown in Table 2, the white dwarf channel produces a simulated Stage A positive superhump period that is shorter than that of Stage B, which has not been observed to date in SU UMa CV systems (Kato & Osaki, 2013). As such, this channel is eliminated as a possibility for J0902 as discussed in .…”
Section: Numerical Simulations -A Summarymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since stage A was not very well observed and the resultant period may have already been affected by stage B superhumps, we independently estimated the period of stage A superhumps by using an empirical relation that the period of stage A superhumps is 1.0-1.5% longer than that of averaged stage B superhumps (Kato et al 2009) [This relation has been confirmed in Kato, Osaki (2013) for well-observed systems]. This method gives a period of 0.13356-0.13422 d. Since the lower limit is close to our direct estimate, we used the upper limit as our upper-limit estimate of the period of stage A superhumps.…”
Section: Superhumpsmentioning
confidence: 96%