2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New measures of the output gap based on the forward-looking new Keynesian Phillips curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
71
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the unobserved output gap that is consistent with the NKPC follows a highly persistent process. This is similar to what Basistha and Nelson (2007) and Kim, Manopimoke, and Nelson (2014) find in the case of the US. These studies estimate NKPC for the US using an alternative measure of inflation expectations and treating the output gap as unobserved in the model.…”
Section: Model 2 Results: Output Gap Is Unobservedsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This implies that the unobserved output gap that is consistent with the NKPC follows a highly persistent process. This is similar to what Basistha and Nelson (2007) and Kim, Manopimoke, and Nelson (2014) find in the case of the US. These studies estimate NKPC for the US using an alternative measure of inflation expectations and treating the output gap as unobserved in the model.…”
Section: Model 2 Results: Output Gap Is Unobservedsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The result of a flat slope of the Phillips curve is not entirely unexpected. In the estimation of the Phillips curve with the forward-looking specification, it is common to find statistically insignificant or incorrectly signed Phillips curve slope parameter ( Basistha and Nelson 2007;Kim, Manopimoke, and Nelson 2014). Though this is not the evidence we find here in the case of the UK.…”
Section: Model 2 Results: Output Gap Is Unobservedcontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations